Whitter v. Waizenegger
- Analisa Torres
- 1:19-cv-00283
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 5
In Whitter v. Waizenegger, Judge Torres remanded the car-crash case to state court because defendants did not show more than $75,000 was at stake.
Patrick Whitter, Mark Edward Waizenegger, and M. Falanga Trucking, LLC. The federal case was closed and returned to Supreme Court, Bronx County.
What happened
Whitter v. Waizenegger involved Patrick Whitter’s claim that Mark Edward Waizenegger crashed a vehicle into Whitter’s car while working for M. Falanga Trucking, LLC. Whitter filed the case in Bronx County state court, and the defendants moved it to federal court.
The parties agreed that they were citizens of different states, but the defendants had to show that more than $75,000 was at stake. Judge Torres found that the complaint’s general descriptions of injuries, and Whitter’s silence about the amount of damages, did not establish a reasonable probability that the case exceeded that amount.
Judge Analisa Torres granted Whitter’s motion to remand. She directed the Clerk of Court to close the federal case and return it to Supreme Court, Bronx County, and to terminate the motion.
The detailed version
- Whitter v. Waizenegger · No. 1:19-cv-00283
- Analisa Torres
- Nov. 21, 2019
Background
Patrick Whitter sued Mark Edward Waizenegger and M. Falanga Trucking, LLC, in Supreme Court, Bronx County. He alleged that Waizenegger crashed a motor vehicle into Whitter’s car while acting in the course of his employment with M. Falanga Trucking. The defendants removed the case to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on January 10, 2019.
Whitter moved to remand, meaning to return the case to state court. The defendants relied on federal diversity jurisdiction, which generally requires citizens of different states and more than $75,000 in controversy.
Analysis
The parties agreed that complete diversity existed: Whitter was a citizen of Florida, Waizenegger was a citizen of Tennessee, and M. Falanga Trucking, LLC, was a citizen of New York. The only disputed issue was whether the amount in controversy exceeded $75,000.
The complaint did not state a specific damages amount. Instead, it alleged that Whitter was sick, sore, lame, disabled, injured, and in pain, and sought damages exceeding the jurisdictional limits of lower courts. Judge Torres held that these general, boilerplate allegations did not establish a reasonable probability that more than $75,000 was at stake. The defendants also relied on Whitter’s failure to stipulate that he would seek no more than $75,000, but the court found that the silence was not enough to meet the defendants’ burden. The defendants had not shown that they had actually sought such a stipulation or that Whitter had refused one.
Ruling
Judge Analisa Torres granted Whitter’s motion to remand. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the federal case, remand it to Supreme Court, Bronx County, and terminate the motion at ECF No. 7.
Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.