Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 22, 2019

McDaniel v. The People of the State of New York

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:19-cv-08166
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
8
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In McDaniel v. The People, Judge McMahon granted Curtis McDaniel leave to file a second amended complaint and denied fee-free appeal status.

Who this affects

Curtis McDaniel, who was representing himself while incarcerated, must file a properly labeled second amended complaint within 60 days or his existing amended complaint will remain operative. The order also affects any attempted appeal by denying permission to proceed without paying the appellate filing fee.

What happened

In McDaniel v. The People of the State of New York, Curtis McDaniel, who was representing himself while incarcerated, said documents had been filed in the wrong case because his mail had been withheld. The court said it could not determine which documents belonged in each of his cases.

The court allowed McDaniel to file a second amended complaint in this case. He must submit it within 60 days, label it with docket number 19-CV-8166 (CM), and use the required complaint form. No summons will issue at this time. If he does not meet the deadline without a valid reason, the amended complaint already filed will remain the operative pleading.

Judge Colleen McMahon also directed the Clerk of Court to mail McDaniel the order and a second amended civil-rights complaint form. The court denied fee-free status for any appeal, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
McDaniel v. The People of the State of New York · No. 1:19-cv-08166
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Nov. 22, 2019

Background

Curtis McDaniel was incarcerated at Rikers Island, represented himself, and was proceeding without paying the filing fee. He had filed an original complaint on August 30, 2019, and another complaint using this case's docket number on September 12, 2019. The Clerk's Office docketed the later filing as an amended complaint because it carried docket number 19-CV-8166.

McDaniel then sent the court a letter saying that he had sent a duplicate amended report because his mail was being withheld. He asked the court to move material from this case into another case and also asked about a separate case. The court noted that McDaniel had other pending cases and had sent similar letters in two of them. Because the court could not determine which documents belonged in which case, it concluded that McDaniel could not amend his pleading through letters identifying documents that belonged elsewhere.

Ruling

Judge Colleen McMahon granted McDaniel leave to file a second amended complaint. The Clerk of Court was directed to mail him a copy of the order and a “Second Amended Civil Rights Complaint” form and to note service on the docket.

McDaniel must submit the second amended complaint to the court's Pro Se Intake Unit within 60 days of the order's date. He must caption it “Second Amended Complaint” and label it with docket number 19-CV-8166 (CM). No summons will issue at this time. If he does not comply within the allowed time and cannot show good cause for the failure, the amended complaint filed on September 12, 2019, will remain the operative pleading.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied McDaniel permission to proceed without paying the filing fee for an appeal. The order did not decide the merits of McDaniel's civil-rights claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 8-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.