TAL Properties of Pomona, LLC v. Village of Pomona
- Philip Halpern
- 7:19-cv-06838
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In TAL Properties of Pomona v. Village of Pomona, Judge Briccetti ordered plaintiffs to choose whether to amend their complaint after defendants moved to dismiss.
TAL Properties of Pomona, LLC and Avrohom Manes had to choose whether to amend their complaint; the Village of Pomona, Brett Yagel, and Doris Ulman received specified options and deadlines if an amended complaint was filed.
What happened
TAL Properties of Pomona, LLC and Avrohom Manes sued the Village of Pomona, Brett Yagel, and Doris Ulman. Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint on November 21, 2019.
The court ordered plaintiffs to notify it by December 6 whether they would file an amended complaint or rely on the existing one. The order did not decide the motion to dismiss.
Judge Vincent L. Briccetti said that if plaintiffs amended, they had to file the new complaint within 14 days after notifying the court. Defendants would then have 21 days to answer, move to dismiss, or rely on their original motion.
The detailed version
- TAL Properties of Pomona, LLC v. Village of Pomona · No. 7:19-cv-06838
- Philip Halpern
- Nov. 22, 2019
Background
Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint on November 21, 2019. The opinion does not describe the claims or the alleged facts underlying the lawsuit.
Order
The court ordered plaintiffs to notify the court by December 6, 2019, whether they intended to file an amended complaint in response to the motion to dismiss or would rely on the complaint already under challenge.
If plaintiffs chose not to amend, the motion to dismiss would proceed under the usual schedule. The court stated that it was unlikely to give plaintiffs another opportunity to amend to address deficiencies made apparent by the fully briefed motion arguments. The deadlines for opposing and reply papers would be governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Civil Rules unless the court ordered otherwise.
If plaintiffs chose to amend, they had to file the amended complaint no later than 14 days after notifying the court. Within 21 days after the amendment, defendants could file an answer, file a motion to dismiss the amended complaint, or notify the court by letter that they would rely on the initial motion to dismiss.
Disposition
The court issued a case-management order concerning plaintiffs' choice about amendment and the next steps for the motion to dismiss. It did not grant or deny the motion to dismiss and did not resolve the merits of the case.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.