Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 26, 2019

Bolivar Guzman v. Toys Outlet Inc.

Judge
Sarah Cave
Docket
1:17-cv-09901
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Bolivar Guzman v. Toys Outlet, Judge Cave ordered the parties to submit materials supporting review of their proposed settlement.

Who this affects

The parties to the Fair Labor Standards Act case, including Jorge Bolivar Guzman, Toys Outlet Inc., the other defendants, and the similarly situated people he sought to represent, were required to provide settlement-review materials.

What happened

Jorge Bolivar Guzman sued Toys Outlet Inc., doing business as Furniture Express, and others under the Fair Labor Standards Act, including claims brought for other similarly situated people. The opinion does not state the specific claims, defenses, or settlement amount.

Because the case includes Fair Labor Standards Act claims, the court required the parties to file a joint letter-motion addressing whether their settlement is fair and reasonable. The parties also had to include the settlement agreement and information about attorney fees and the litigation and negotiation process.

Judge Sarah L. Cave ordered the parties to file those materials by December 9, 2019, and directed the Clerk of Court to mail the order to defendant Israel Aboutboul. The order required settlement-review materials; it did not state that the court approved or rejected the settlement.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Bolivar Guzman v. Toys Outlet Inc. · No. 1:17-cv-09901
Judge
Sarah Cave
Date
Nov. 26, 2019

Background

The case includes one or more claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The opinion identifies Jorge Bolivar Guzman as the plaintiff and Toys Outlet Inc., doing business as Furniture Express, and others as defendants. The order does not describe the specific claims or defenses or state the proposed settlement amount.

Required settlement materials

Citing the Second Circuit’s decision in Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., the court required the parties to file a joint letter-motion addressing whether their settlement was fair and reasonable. The submission had to discuss the claims and defenses, the defendants’ potential monetary exposure and the basis for calculating it, the strengths and weaknesses of the plaintiff’s case and the defenses, reasons for any difference between the potential value of the claims and the settlement amount, and the litigation and negotiation process. It could also address other relevant issues, such as whether a judgment would be collectible after trial.

The parties also had to explain the attorney-fee arrangement, attach the retainer agreement, provide information about actual attorney fees expended, and attach the settlement agreement itself.

Order

Judge Sarah L. Cave ordered the parties to file the joint letter-motion by Monday, December 9, 2019. The Clerk of Court was directed to mail the order to defendant Israel Aboutboul at the address listed in the order. The opinion does not say that the court approved or rejected the settlement; it orders the parties to submit information for the court’s review.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.