JLT Specialty Insurance Services Inc. v. NFP Property and Casualty Services
JLT Specialty Insurance Services Inc. v. NFP Property and Casualty Services, Inc.
- Kenneth Karas
- 7:19-cv-03921
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In JLT Specialty Insurance Services v. NFP Property and Casualty Services, Judge Karas received a request to seal employment-related exhibits; the text shows no ruling.
JLT Specialty Insurance Services Inc., NFP Property and Casualty Services, Inc., and four former JLT employees whose employment information appeared in the proposed exhibits.
What happened
JLT Specialty Insurance Services Inc. asked the court to let it file certain exhibits privately while opposing NFP Property and Casualty Services, Inc.’s motion to transfer or dismiss the complaint.
The exhibits contained emails and attachments about NFP’s hiring of four former JLT employees and their employment terms. The documents had been produced in a related case under a protective order, and JLT argued that protecting private employment information outweighed the public’s interest in access.
The letter was addressed to Judge Kenneth M. Karas. The provided text shows only JLT’s request and does not show a ruling on sealing the exhibits or on NFP’s motion.
The detailed version
- JLT Specialty Insurance Services Inc. v. NFP Property and Casualty Services · No. 7:19-cv-03921
- Kenneth Karas
- Nov. 25, 2019
Background
The provided text is a November 22, 2019 letter from Shawn Matthew Clark, counsel for Plaintiff JLT Specialty Insurance Services Inc., to Judge Kenneth M. Karas. The letter asks permission to file exhibits under seal in support of JLT’s opposition to Defendant NFP Property and Casualty Services, Inc.’s motion to transfer or dismiss the complaint.
Requested Sealing
The proposed sealed exhibits consisted of emails and attachments concerning NFP’s hiring of four people who formerly worked for JLT and the terms of those individuals’ employment. JLT stated that NFP had produced the documents in a related action, JLT Specialty Insurance Services Inc. v. Pestana, et al., No. 3:19-cv-02427 (N.D. Cal.), under a stipulated protective order covering patents, highly sensitive confidential information, and trade secrets.
JLT acknowledged that the exhibits were judicial documents because it intended to rely on them in opposing NFP’s motion. It argued that the public-access presumption was outweighed by the privacy interests of nonparties whose employment information appeared in the documents. JLT also stated that the proposed exhibits were listed in a publicly filed declaration with placeholder exhibit pages and could be provided to the court for private review.
Disposition
The provided text does not contain a court order or ruling. It shows only JLT’s request for permission to file the exhibits under seal. No disposition of that request, the motion to transfer, or the motion to dismiss appears in the text.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.