Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 27, 2019

Wrobleski v. The City of New York

Judge
Vernon Broderick
Docket
1:18-cv-08208
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil RightsSection 1983Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Wrobleski v. City of New York, Judge Broderick ordered federal marshals to serve defendants and extended the service deadline for the self-represented plaintiff.

Who this affects

Jessica Wrobleski and the named defendants—Little Flower Children and Family Services, Barbara Simon, Sheila Johnson, David Usdan, and the City of New York—are affected by the court’s directions for service.

What happened

In Wrobleski v. The City of New York, Jessica Wrobleski, representing herself, brought a constitutional-rights lawsuit under federal law against Little Flower Children and Family Services, several individuals, and the City of New York. The court had previously allowed her to proceed without paying filing fees in advance.

Because Wrobleski was allowed to proceed without paying fees, the court said she could rely on the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants. The court extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summons is issued and directed the Clerk of Court to prepare the required forms and paperwork.

Judge Vernon S. Broderick ordered the Clerk to send the documents to the Marshals Service and mail Wrobleski an information package. The order also required her to notify the court if her address changes and stated that the case may be dismissed if she does not do so.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Wrobleski v. The City of New York · No. 1:18-cv-08208
Judge
Vernon Broderick
Date
Nov. 27, 2019

Background

Jessica Wrobleski, proceeding without a lawyer, brought claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a federal law that allows claims against certain state or local actors for violating constitutional rights. The defendants identified in the order are Little Flower Children and Family Services, Barbara Simon, Sheila Johnson, David Usdan, and the City of New York.

The court had previously granted Wrobleski permission to proceed without paying filing fees in advance. The order explains that a plaintiff proceeding under that permission may rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the summons and complaint.

Service of Process

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 generally requires service within 90 days after the complaint is filed. The court held that Wrobleski could not have served the defendants before the court reviewed the complaint and directed that a summons be issued. The court therefore extended the time for service until 90 days after the summons is issued.

The court directed the Clerk of Court to complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for each defendant, issue the summons, and deliver the necessary paperwork to the Marshals Service. The order states that, if service is not completed within that period, Wrobleski should request an extension of time.

Disposition

Judge Vernon S. Broderick entered an order directing the Clerk to mail Wrobleski a copy of the order and an information package and to provide the Marshals Service with the documents needed to serve Little Flower Children and Family Services, Barbara Simon, Sheila Johnson, David Usdan, and the City of New York. Wrobleski must notify the court in writing if her address changes; the order states that the court may dismiss the action if she fails to do so. The order addresses service of process and does not decide whether the alleged constitutional violations occurred.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.