Tarbell-Littman v. TFO USA Limited
- Barbara Moses
- 1:19-cv-03063
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Tarbell-Littman v. TFO USA Limited, Judge Moses approved the parties’ settlement and dismissed the action with prejudice and without costs.
Katharine Tarbell-Littman and TFO USA Limited, whose revised settlement was approved; the action was dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
What happened
Tarbell-Littman v. TFO USA Limited involved the parties’ request for approval of a revised settlement agreement. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims.
The court reviewed the revised agreement and found its terms fair and reasonable under the required settlement-approval standard.
Judge Moses approved the settlement and dismissed the action with prejudice and without costs. The clerk was directed to close the case.
The detailed version
- Tarbell-Littman v. TFO USA Limited · No. 1:19-cv-03063
- Barbara Moses
- Dec. 2, 2019
Background
The parties submitted a joint letter asking the court to approve their revised proposed Settlement Agreement. The opinion does not identify the underlying claims or provide additional facts about the dispute.
Court’s Analysis
The court reviewed the revised agreement under the settlement-approval requirement discussed in Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc. The court found that the agreement’s terms were fair and reasonable.
Disposition
The court approved the proposed settlement. It dismissed the action with prejudice and without costs, and directed the clerk to close the case.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.