Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 3, 2019

Thomas v. City of New York

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:19-cv-11028
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Thomas v. City of New York, Judge McMahon ordered James Thomas to pay filing fees or submit forms to proceed without prepayment.

Who this affects

James Thomas, the incarcerated plaintiff proceeding without a lawyer; the order also directed the Clerk of Court and the facility holding Thomas to take specified administrative or payment-related steps.

What happened

Thomas v. City of New York concerns James Thomas’s civil action, which he filed without paying the required fees or submitting the forms needed to request permission to proceed without prepayment. The opinion states that Thomas is incarcerated and representing himself.

The court gave Thomas 30 days to pay $400 in fees or submit a signed application and authorization allowing installment payments from his prison account. The court directed that no summons issue yet and warned that failing to comply would result in dismissal of the action.

Judge Colleen McMahon also denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. The order did not decide the claims in the complaint.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Thomas v. City of New York · No. 1:19-cv-11028
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Dec. 3, 2019

Background

James Thomas, who was incarcerated at Five Points Correctional Facility and proceeded without a lawyer, filed this civil action without paying the required filing fees and without submitting a completed application to proceed without prepaying fees or a prisoner authorization. The opinion states that the case had been transferred from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York.

Court’s Order

The court explained that a prisoner bringing a civil action must either pay $400 in fees—a $350 filing fee and a $50 administrative fee—or submit a signed application to proceed without prepayment and a prisoner authorization. If permission to proceed without prepayment is granted, the $350 filing fee is collected in installments from the prisoner’s account. The authorization also directs the correctional facility to make those deductions and provide certified copies of the prisoner’s account statements for the previous six months.

The court ordered Thomas, within 30 days of December 3, 2019, to either pay the $400 in fees or submit the required application and authorization using docket number 19-CV-11028 (CM). The Clerk was directed to assign the matter to Judge McMahon’s docket, mail Thomas a copy of the order, and record service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time. The court stated that the case would be processed under the Clerk’s procedures if Thomas complied and would be dismissed if he did not comply within the allowed time.

Appeal and Other Warnings

Judge Colleen McMahon certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The court also warned that a dismissal for frivolousness or failure to state a claim can count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), potentially affecting a prisoner’s ability to proceed without prepaying fees in future cases. The order did not rule on the substance of Thomas’s claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.