Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 4, 2019

Guadalupe v. Keyser

Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Docket
7:17-cv-07832
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
HabeasCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Guadalupe v. Keyser, Judge Briccetti adopted the magistrate judge’s report and denied Guadalupe’s habeas petition.

Who this affects

Jose Guadalupe’s habeas petition was denied. The court also refused to issue a certificate of appealability and denied permission to appeal without paying court fees.

What happened

In Guadalupe v. Keyser, Jose Guadalupe asked the court to grant his petition challenging his custody. A magistrate judge recommended denying the petition.

Neither side objected to the recommendation. Because the court could not confirm that Guadalupe originally received it at the correct address, it mailed the recommendation again to the correctional facility where he was housed.

Judge Vincent L. Briccetti found no error, adopted the recommendation as the court’s opinion, and denied the petition. The court also declined to issue a certificate allowing an appeal and denied permission to appeal without paying court fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Guadalupe v. Keyser · No. 7:17-cv-07832
Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Date
Dec. 4, 2019

Background

Jose Guadalupe filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, a request for federal court relief from allegedly unlawful custody. Magistrate Judge Paul E. Davison issued a report and recommendation on May 20, 2019, recommending that the petition be denied in its entirety.

Review of the Recommendation

The district court explained that it could accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge’s recommendation. Neither party filed objections. The court could not confirm that the recommendation had been mailed to Guadalupe’s correct address at first, so it re-mailed the recommendation to Upstate Correctional Facility, where court records showed Guadalupe was housed. The court still received no objections and found no error in the recommendation.

Ruling

Judge Vincent L. Briccetti adopted the report and recommendation as the opinion of the court and denied the habeas petition. The clerk was directed to enter judgment and close the case. The court also ruled that no certificate of appealability would issue because Guadalupe had not made a substantial showing that a constitutional right was denied. It further certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying court fees.

Classification

This is a procedural order because the court denied the habeas petition by adopting a magistrate judge’s recommendation after clear-error review, without discussing the underlying habeas claim’s merits in this opinion.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.