Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 3, 2019

The Management Group, LLC v. Holidaynet LLC

Judge
Vernon Broderick
Docket
1:19-cv-04917-VSB
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In The Management Group v. Holidaynet, Judge Broderick took no action on disputed diversity jurisdiction and ordered Holidaynet to respond by January 3, 2020.

Who this affects

The order primarily affected Holidaynet LLC, which was given until January 3, 2020, to answer, file a motion, or otherwise respond to the complaint. It also left The Management Group, LLC’s jurisdiction and default-judgment issues unresolved.

What happened

The Management Group, LLC sued Holidaynet LLC and others for breach of contract, asserting that federal court jurisdiction was based on the parties’ citizenship. After Holidaynet initially failed to appear, the court scheduled a hearing concerning a possible default judgment.

At the hearing, the parties gave conflicting accounts about the members and citizenship of their limited liability companies. Holidaynet argued that the parties were not completely diverse and that the court could not transfer the case to New Jersey; The Management Group argued that its sole member was not a member of Holidaynet and that diversity jurisdiction existed.

Judge Vernon S. Broderick said he had not decided that diversity jurisdiction was lacking and would not decide it based on the parties’ unsupported accounts. Because neither party requested specific relief, he took no action on those issues and ordered Holidaynet to answer, file a motion, or otherwise respond to the complaint by January 3, 2020.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
The Management Group, LLC v. Holidaynet LLC · No. 1:19-cv-04917-VSB
Judge
Vernon Broderick
Date
Dec. 3, 2019

Background

The Management Group, LLC filed a breach-of-contract complaint on May 27, 2019, asserting that the federal court had diversity jurisdiction. The complaint named Holidaynet LLC and others as defendants. After Holidaynet failed to appear, The Management Group submitted a proposed order seeking a default judgment, which Judge Broderick signed on October 17, 2019, setting a hearing for November 7, 2019.

Holidaynet appeared at the hearing, along with its majority owner, Jo Ellen Gabel. The court asked the parties to identify the members of their limited liability companies and those members’ citizenship. The court noted that, for diversity-jurisdiction purposes, a limited liability company has the citizenship of each of its members.

The Parties’ Positions

The parties gave different accounts of the ownership and citizenship facts. They indicated that The Management Group’s owner, whom the opinion describes as a New York citizen, was also a member of Holidaynet, and that Gabel was a New Jersey citizen. The court therefore said that diversity jurisdiction might be in question and that transfer to the District of New Jersey might be appropriate.

In later letters, Holidaynet stated that the court had determined at the hearing that complete diversity was lacking. Holidaynet argued that diversity jurisdiction also would not support a transfer to New Jersey and that the court therefore lacked authority to transfer the case. The Management Group disputed Holidaynet’s account, asserting that neither it nor its sole member was a member of Holidaynet. The Management Group argued that diversity jurisdiction existed and that the court could either keep the case in the Southern District of New York or transfer it to New Jersey.

Ruling

Judge Vernon S. Broderick clarified that he had not found that diversity jurisdiction was lacking at the hearing. He also declined to make that finding in the December 3 order because the parties had provided conflicting and unsupported accounts of the jurisdictional facts. The court further noted that neither party’s letter affirmatively requested specific relief. It concluded that no action was required at that time.

The court ordered Holidaynet to answer, file a motion, or otherwise respond to the complaint by January 3, 2020. The order did not decide whether diversity jurisdiction existed, whether the case should be transferred, or whether The Management Group was entitled to a default judgment.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.