Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 4, 2019

Verragio, LTD. v. Apollo Manufacturing/Diamonds & Gold

Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Docket
1:19-cv-05422
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Verragio v. Apollo, Judge Abrams discontinued the settled case without costs, allowing restoration within 30 days.

Who this affects

Verragio, LTD. and Apollo Manufacturing/Diamonds & Gold; the action was closed following the reported settlement, subject to the stated 30-day restoration procedure.

What happened

Verragio, LTD. v. Apollo Manufacturing/Diamonds & Gold was reported to the court as settled.

The order does not describe the settlement’s terms or the parties’ underlying dispute.

Judge Ronnie Abrams discontinued the action without costs and without prejudice to restoring it within 30 days, and directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Verragio, LTD. v. Apollo Manufacturing/Diamonds & Gold · No. 1:19-cv-05422
Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Date
Dec. 4, 2019

Background

The court stated that it had been informed that the case was settled. The opinion does not provide the settlement terms or address the merits of the underlying dispute.

Order

Judge Ronnie Abrams ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s docket if an application to restore was made within 30 days. Any application to reopen filed after that period could be denied solely because it was late. The court also stated that, if the parties wanted it to retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the agreement’s terms had to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within the same 30-day period. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.