No v. Bank of America
- Colleen McMahon
- 1:19-cv-11284
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In No v. Bank of America, Judge McMahon ordered Jeong-Suk No to pay fees or submit an amended financial application.
Jeong-Suk No must either pay $400 in fees or submit an amended application within 30 days; the action would be dismissed if he did not comply.
What happened
Jeong-Suk No, representing himself, sued Bank of America and asked to proceed without paying the filing fees upfront. He submitted a financial application, but did not answer questions about his income and financial situation.
The court ordered No, within 30 days, either to pay $400 in fees or submit an amended application showing that he cannot afford them. The court warned that the action would be dismissed if he did not comply.
Judge Colleen McMahon also denied permission to proceed without paying fees for any appeal from this order, finding that such an appeal would not be taken in good faith.
The detailed version
- No v. Bank of America · No. 1:19-cv-11284
- Colleen McMahon
- Dec. 11, 2019
Background
Jeong-Suk No brought the action against Bank of America and proceeded without a lawyer. To continue a civil action in the court, a plaintiff must either pay $400 in fees—a $350 filing fee and a $50 administrative fee—or submit a signed application asking to proceed without paying the fees upfront.
No submitted such an application. He stated that he was unemployed but did not answer the questions about his income and financial situation. Because the application did not provide enough information about his income, expenses, or assets, the court could not determine that he lacked enough funds to pay the fees.
Order
The court ordered No, within 30 days of the order, to do one of two things: pay the $400 in fees or submit an amended application. The amended application must answer every question, identify all sources of income and monthly expenses, describe how No supports himself, and include docket number 19-CV-11284 (CM). If the court grants the amended application, No may proceed without paying the fees upfront.
The court stated that the action would be dismissed if No failed to comply within the allowed time. The order did not decide the underlying claims against Bank of America.
Appeal and disposition
Judge Colleen McMahon certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying fees for purposes of an appeal. The order therefore directed payment of the fees or submission of an amended application; it did not itself dismiss the action.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.