Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 13, 2019

Gallagher v. Drug Enforcement Administration

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:19-cv-10988
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureTortPro Se
In one sentence

In Gallagher v. Drug Enforcement Agency, Judge McMahon transferred the FTCA case to Colorado because venue was improper in New York.

Who this affects

Ryan Gallagher and the Shaivite Temple's FTCA action was transferred from the Southern District of New York to the District of Colorado; the Colorado court was left to decide whether Gallagher could proceed without prepaying fees.

What happened

Ryan Gallagher, also known as Rev. Ryan Sasha-Shai Van Kush, sued the Drug Enforcement Agency and its agents on behalf of himself and the Shaivite Temple under the Federal Tort Claims Act. He represented himself without a lawyer.

The court held that the case could not proceed in the Southern District of New York because Gallagher did not reside there and did not allege that the relevant events occurred there. The opinion states that he resides in Colorado and that his claims apparently arose there.

Chief United States District Judge Colleen McMahon ordered the case transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. The New York court closed the case, did not issue a summons, and left the question of proceeding without paying filing fees to the Colorado court. It also denied fee-free status for any appeal from the order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Gallagher v. Drug Enforcement Administration · No. 1:19-cv-10988
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Dec. 13, 2019

Background

Ryan Gallagher, also known as Rev. Ryan Sasha-Shai Van Kush, appeared without a lawyer and brought an action on behalf of himself and the Shaivite Temple against the Drug Enforcement Agency and its agents. He invoked the Federal Tort Claims Act, a federal law that allows certain claims against the United States for torts committed by federal employees. The opinion notes that the United States, rather than a federal agency or individual employees, is the only proper defendant in an action under that law.

Venue analysis

The court applied the Federal Tort Claims Act's venue rule, which permits such claims to be prosecuted only in the federal district where the plaintiff resides or where the complained-of act or omission occurred. The court found that Gallagher did not reside in the Southern District of New York and had not alleged that the events or omissions supporting his claims occurred there. The opinion states that Gallagher is a resident of Colorado, where his claims apparently arose. It therefore concluded that venue was proper in the District of Colorado, not the Southern District of New York.

Disposition

Chief United States District Judge Colleen McMahon ordered the action transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. The Clerk was directed to mail the order to Gallagher and record service. The New York court did not decide whether he could proceed without paying fees; that decision was left to the transferee court. It directed that no summons issue, closed the case, and certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith, denying fee-free status for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.