Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 13, 2019

Megginson v. Camron

Judge
Gregory Woods
Docket
1:18-cv-07206
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Megginson v. Camron, Judge Woods redirected a summary-judgment letter to another case and denied appeal fee-free status.

Who this affects

Michael E. Megginson, the defendants in Megginson v. Camron, and the handling of Megginson’s letter concerning Robert Molina; any appeal from the order would not receive fee-free status.

What happened

In Megginson v. Camron, Michael E. Megginson sent the court a letter asking, among other things, for summary judgment against Robert Molina. The letter was filed in this case because it listed this case number, 1:18-cv-7206-GHW.

Because the letter referred to Molina, the court treated it as an application in a separate case, 1:18-cv-05808-GHW. The court docketed the letter in that case and stated that the defendants in Megginson v. Camron did not need to take further action on it.

Judge Gregory H. Woods also certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for an appeal. The Clerk was directed to mail the order to Megginson by first-class and certified mail.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Megginson v. Camron · No. 1:18-cv-07206
Judge
Gregory Woods
Date
Dec. 13, 2019

Background

On November 27, 2019, Michael E. Megginson sent the court a letter that included a request for summary judgment against Robert Molina. The letter was captioned with the number “18cv7206” and was therefore filed in this action.

Court’s Treatment of the Letter

The court noted that the letter referred to Defendant Molina. It therefore understood the letter as an application in a separate case, 1:18-cv-05808-GHW, and docketed the letter in that case. The court stated that no further action was required from the defendants in this matter.

Appeal Status and Disposition

Judge Gregory H. Woods certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. The court therefore denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal. The Clerk of Court was directed to mail Megginson a copy of the order by first-class and certified mail.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.