Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 18, 2019

Al-Haj v. Singer

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:19-cv-03135-LJL
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Al-Haj v. Singer, Judge McMahon gave Al-Haj 30 more days to pay the filing fee or submit an application to proceed without fees.

Who this affects

Nagibe Al-Haj, who received an additional 30 days to pay the filing fee or submit an application to proceed without paying it.

What happened

In Al-Haj v. Singer, the court had previously dismissed the case without prejudice because Nagibe Al-Haj had not submitted an application to proceed without paying fees or paid the required filing fees.

Al-Haj later asked for more time and for a lawyer. The court treated that letter as a request to change the dismissal, granted the request, vacated the dismissal and judgment, and reopened the case. The appeals court then dismissed Al-Haj’s appeal because the judgment had been vacated.

Judge McMahon granted Al-Haj an additional 30 days from December 18, 2019, to pay the filing fee or submit an application to proceed without paying it. The court also denied fee-free status for any appeal from this order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Al-Haj v. Singer · No. 1:19-cv-03135-LJL
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Dec. 18, 2019

Background

The court had dismissed the action without prejudice on May 20, 2019, because Plaintiff Nagibe Al-Haj had not submitted a completed application to proceed without paying filing fees and had not paid the $400 filing fees required to file a civil action in the court.

On June 7, 2019, Al-Haj sent a letter stating that he did not have a lawyer and asking for more time to respond to a motion to dismiss and for appointment of a lawyer. On June 24, 2019, the court treated the letter as a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) to alter or amend the judgment. The court granted that motion, directed the Clerk to vacate the dismissal order and civil judgment, and reopened the action.

Appeal and Current Order

Al-Haj filed a notice of appeal on June 18, 2019. On November 27, 2019, the Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal after determining that it lacked jurisdiction because the district court had later granted reconsideration and vacated the judgment.

Ruling

Judge Colleen McMahon granted Plaintiff an additional 30 days from December 18, 2019, to pay the filing fee or submit an application to proceed without paying it. The Clerk was directed to mail the order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.