Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 18, 2019

DeJesus v. Rudolph

Judge
Vernon Broderick
Docket
1:19-cv-04480
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In DeJesus v. Rudolph, Judge Broderick ordered marshals to serve the defendants and extended the service deadline.

Who this affects

Alex DeJesus, Stephanie Rudolph, the New York City Commission on Human Rights, the Clerk of Court, and the U.S. Marshals Service.

What happened

In DeJesus v. Rudolph, Alex DeJesus alleges that Stephanie Rudolph and the New York City Commission on Human Rights violated his rights. The opinion does not describe the alleged violations.

DeJesus was allowed to proceed without paying filing fees, so the court said he could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants. He initially filed the case without a lawyer, but an attorney later appeared for him and filed an amended complaint.

Judge Vernon S. Broderick ordered the Clerk of Court to issue summonses, prepare service forms with the defendants’ addresses, and send the necessary documents to the Marshals Service. The court extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summonses are issued and denied permission to proceed without paying fees for any appeal from this order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
DeJesus v. Rudolph · No. 1:19-cv-04480
Judge
Vernon Broderick
Date
Dec. 18, 2019

Background

Alex DeJesus alleges that Stephanie Rudolph and the New York City Commission on Human Rights violated his rights. The opinion does not state the specific claims or alleged conduct. DeJesus was permitted to proceed without prepaying filing fees. He initially appeared without a lawyer, but Attorney Peter A. Saad, Jr. later filed a notice of appearance, and DeJesus, through counsel, filed an amended complaint.

Service of Process

Because DeJesus was proceeding without prepaying filing fees, the court explained that he could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants. The court said that the usual 90-day service period could not begin in the ordinary way because summonses had not yet been issued and counsel had not requested their issuance. The court therefore extended the time for service until 90 days after the summonses are issued.

The Clerk of Court was instructed to issue summonses, complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for Stephanie Rudolph and the New York City Commission on Human Rights using the listed addresses, and provide the Marshals Service with the documents needed to serve both defendants.

Disposition

The order directs the Clerk of Court to take the service-related steps described above. It does not decide the merits of DeJesus’s claims. The court also certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.