Martinez Aguilar v. VBFS Inc.
- James Cott
- 1:19-cv-00621
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Martinez Aguilar v. VBFS Inc., Judge Cott ordered the parties to seek court approval of their settlement agreement.
The order affects Lorena Martinez Aguilar, Manuel Carranza Cayetano, VBFS Inc. d/b/a M&M Market Deli, Virgilia Branco, and Fernando Pinho Sanches by requiring them to submit their proposed settlement for court approval.
What happened
Lorena Martinez Aguilar and Manuel Carranza Cayetano, individually and for others similarly situated, sued VBFS Inc., Virgilia Branco, and Fernando Pinho Sanches. The opinion does not describe the claims.
The parties attended a settlement conference and reached a settlement in principle. They also agreed that Magistrate Judge James L. Cott could review the settlement because he was familiar with its terms.
Judge Cott ordered the parties to file a joint request and their settlement agreement by January 20, 2020. The request must explain why the settlement is fair, reasonable, and consistent with applicable Second Circuit requirements; the order did not itself approve the settlement.
The detailed version
- Martinez Aguilar v. VBFS Inc. · No. 1:19-cv-00621
- James Cott
- Dec. 18, 2019
Background
The plaintiffs are Lorena Martinez Aguilar and Manuel Carranza Cayetano, suing individually and on behalf of others similarly situated. The defendants are VBFS Inc., doing business as M&M Market Deli, Virgilia Branco, and Fernando Pinho Sanches. The opinion does not identify the underlying claims or provide the terms of the proposed settlement.
The parties appeared before Judge Cott for a settlement conference and reached a settlement in principle. They signed a consent allowing Judge Cott to exercise authority over the case under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), so that he could review their settlement agreement based on his familiarity with its terms.
Order
Judge Cott ordered the parties to file a joint letter motion and their settlement agreement no later than January 20, 2020, requesting court approval. The letter motion must explain why the proposed settlement is fair and reasonable and otherwise complies with the Second Circuit's requirements in Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc.
The order also directed the parties to several other Southern District of New York decisions for guidance about settlement terms, including reemployment provisions, restrictions on communications with the media, releases, mutual non-disparagement provisions, confidentiality provisions, and general releases. It identified several recently approved settlement papers as examples.
Disposition and effect
The order directed the parties to submit materials seeking approval of the settlement. It did not state that the settlement was approved, and it did not enter judgment or otherwise resolve the underlying claims.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.