Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 23, 2019

Cook v. Quattrocchi

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:19-cv-11659
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Cook v. Quattrocchi, Judge McMahon ordered Kevin Cook to pay fees or submit authorization to proceed without prepayment.

Who this affects

Kevin Cook, a prisoner proceeding without a lawyer, must either pay the required fees or submit the required prisoner authorization within 30 days.

What happened

Cook v. Quattrocchi concerns Kevin Cook, who is incarcerated at the Orange County Jail and filed this action without a lawyer. He submitted an application to proceed without prepaying court fees but did not submit the required prisoner authorization.

The court ordered Cook, within 30 days, either to pay $400 in fees or submit the authorization. The authorization would allow installment deductions from his jail account and provide the court with certified account statements for the previous six months.

Judge Colleen McMahon directed the Clerk to send Cook the order and stated that no summons would issue at that time. If Cook does not comply, the action will be dismissed; the court also denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Cook v. Quattrocchi · No. 1:19-cv-11659
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Dec. 23, 2019

Background

Kevin Cook, who is incarcerated at the Orange County Jail, brought this action without a lawyer. He submitted an application to proceed without prepaying court fees, but he did not submit the required prisoner authorization.

Court’s requirements

The court explained that a prisoner must either pay $400 in fees—a $350 filing fee and a $50 administrative fee—or submit a signed application and prisoner authorization to request permission to proceed without prepaying fees. If permission is granted, the Prison Litigation Reform Act requires collection of the $350 filing fee through installment deductions from the prisoner’s account. The authorization also directs the correctional facility to send the court certified copies of the prisoner’s account statements for the previous six months. The $50 administrative fee does not apply to a person granted permission to proceed without prepaying fees.

Order

The court ordered Cook to do one of the following within 30 days of the order’s date: pay the $400 in fees or complete and submit the attached prisoner authorization, labeled with docket number 19-CV-11659 (CM). The court stated that if Cook complies, the case will be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures. If he does not comply within the allowed time, the action will be dismissed. No summons would issue at that time.

The court directed the Clerk to assign the matter to Judge Colleen McMahon’s docket, mail Cook a copy of the order, and record service on the docket. The court also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. Finally, the order warned that a later dismissal for frivolousness or failure to state a claim could count as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and that three strikes generally prevent a prisoner from proceeding without prepaying fees unless the prisoner faces imminent danger of serious physical injury.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.