Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 20, 2019

Hill v. Abrams

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:19-cv-11604
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Hill v. Abrams, Judge McMahon transferred the case to the Western District of New York for improper venue.

Who this affects

Desean Hill’s case was moved from the Southern District of New York to the Western District of New York. The receiving court would decide whether he could proceed without prepaying filing fees; the opinion does not resolve his claims against the defendants.

What happened

Hill v. Abrams is a civil-rights lawsuit brought by incarcerated plaintiff Desean Hill without a lawyer. He challenged conditions at South Port Correctional Facility in Pine City, New York.

The court found that the case did not belong in the Southern District of New York because the defendants were not alleged to live there and the relevant events occurred in Pine City, in the Western District of New York.

Judge Colleen McMahon ordered the case transferred to the Western District of New York, closed the case in her court, and left any decision about proceeding without paying filing fees to the receiving court.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Hill v. Abrams · No. 1:19-cv-11604
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Dec. 20, 2019

Background

Desean Hill, who was incarcerated at South Port Correctional Facility, brought this action without a lawyer under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a federal law that allows claims against state actors for violating constitutional rights. He alleged that defendants violated his rights through conditions at the facility.

Venue Analysis

The court applied the federal venue statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). That statute generally permits a civil case to be filed where a defendant resides, where a substantial part of the events occurred, or, in limited circumstances, where a defendant is subject to the court’s authority.

The court found that Hill did not allege that any defendant resided in the Southern District of New York or that a substantial part of the events occurred there. Because the claims arose at the facility in Pine City, New York, in Chemung County, the court determined that venue was proper in the Western District of New York.

Disposition

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), the court transferred the action to the United States District Court for the Western District of New York. The order states that the clerk should transfer the action, that the transferee court would decide whether Hill could proceed without prepaying fees, and that no summons would issue from the Southern District of New York. The order also states that it closes this case and denies permission to appeal without prepaying fees because the court certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. The court did not decide the substance of Hill’s allegations.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.