Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 30, 2019

Dimopoulou v. First Unum Life Insurance Company

Judge
Andrew Carter
Docket
1:13-cv-07159
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
ErisaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Dimopoulou v. First Unum Life Insurance Company, Judge Carter ruled the appeal was timely and ordered First Unum to decide it within 60 days.

Who this affects

Dimitra Dimopoulou and First Unum Life Insurance Company; the order requires First Unum to decide Dimopoulou’s administrative appeal within 60 days.

What happened

Dimopoulou v. First Unum Life Insurance Company concerned Dimitra Dimopoulou’s administrative appeal of First Unum’s decision on her claim.

The court found that First Unum’s notice did not adequately explain the appeal procedures or give a deadline for filing an appeal. The court also explained that the 180-day period in the federal regulations is the minimum time administrators must provide, not a maximum deadline.

Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. ruled that Dimopoulou’s appeal was not untimely and directed First Unum to decide the appeal within 60 days of the order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Dimopoulou v. First Unum Life Insurance Company · No. 1:13-cv-07159
Judge
Andrew Carter
Date
Dec. 30, 2019

Background

The court considered the parties’ letters about Dimitra Dimopoulou’s administrative appeal of First Unum Life Insurance Company’s claim determination. The opinion concerns the timing and handling of that appeal; it does not decide whether Dimopoulou is entitled to benefits.

Legal reasoning

The court relied on regulations governing employee benefit plans under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. When a plan administrator makes an adverse benefit determination, the administrator must describe the plan’s review procedures and the deadlines that apply to review. The court stated that when a denial notice does not specify a deadline for administrative review, the plan’s time bar is not triggered.

The court found that First Unum’s notice did not sufficiently explain the administrative review procedures or specify a deadline for submitting an appeal. As a result, the court concluded that Dimopoulou’s appeal was not untimely.

The court also rejected First Unum’s argument that the regulations required Dimopoulou to appeal within 180 days of the denial. The court explained that the regulation requires administrators to provide claimants at least 180 days to appeal. That period is a minimum, not a maximum.

Order

Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. directed First Unum to decide Dimopoulou’s appeal within 60 days of the December 30, 2019 order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.