Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 30, 2019

Frost v. City of New York

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:19-cv-11837
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Frost v. City of New York (HRA), Judge McMahon dismissed Yvonne Frost’s new action without prejudice for violating a prior filing restriction.

Who this affects

Yvonne Frost’s newly filed action was dismissed without prejudice, and she was denied permission to proceed without paying the filing fee on appeal. The opinion does not decide the underlying claims against the defendants.

What happened

In Frost v. City of New York (HRA), Yvonne Frost filed a new case without a lawyer and asked to proceed without paying the filing fee. A prior order had required her to obtain permission before filing any new case without paying that fee.

Frost had not asked for that permission before filing this case. The court therefore dismissed the action without prejudice because she failed to comply with the prior order.

Judge Colleen McMahon also ruled that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Frost permission to proceed without paying the filing fee on appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Frost v. City of New York · No. 1:19-cv-11837
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Dec. 30, 2019

Background

Yvonne Frost filed this new case without a lawyer, requested permission to proceed without paying the filing fee, and had not obtained the court’s required permission to file. The court stated that a November 7, 2019 order had barred Frost from filing any new action without paying the filing fee unless she first obtained leave from the court.

Ruling

The court dismissed this action without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1651 because Frost failed to comply with the November 7 order. A dismissal without prejudice does not bar refiling, although the opinion does not explain what steps would be required for any new filing.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied permission to proceed without paying the filing fee for an appeal. Judge Colleen McMahon directed the Clerk of Court to assign the matter to her docket, send Frost a copy of the order, and record service on the docket.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.