Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 6, 2020

Kruppenbacher v. Annuci

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:20-cv-00071
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Kruppenbacher v. Annuci, Judge McMahon ordered updated fee-waiver forms or payment before the prisoner’s case could proceed.

Who this affects

Joseph Kruppenbacher, an incarcerated plaintiff representing himself, must either pay the required fees or submit completed fee-waiver and prisoner-authorization forms within 30 days to continue the action.

What happened

In Kruppenbacher v. Annuci, Joseph Kruppenbacher, who was incarcerated and representing himself, filed a civil lawsuit concerning events from 2015. He submitted a handwritten request to proceed without paying court fees upfront and a prisoner authorization form.

The court ordered him, within 30 days, either to pay $400 in fees or submit completed forms authorizing installment payments from his prison account. The court did not issue a summons, and it warned that failing to comply would result in dismissal without prejudice. The court also denied permission to appeal without paying fees.

Chief United States District Judge Colleen McMahon issued the order on January 6, 2020. The order addressed filing requirements and did not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Kruppenbacher v. Annuci · No. 1:20-cv-00071
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Jan. 6, 2020

Background

Joseph Kruppenbacher filed a civil action against Anthony J. Annuci and other defendants. The opinion says Kruppenbacher was incarcerated at Clinton Correctional Facility, was representing himself, and asserted claims arising from events in 2015.

A prisoner filing a civil action in the court must either pay $400 in fees—a $350 filing fee and a $50 administrative fee—or request permission to proceed without paying fees upfront. A prisoner making that request must submit a signed application and an authorization allowing the facility to deduct the $350 filing fee from the prisoner’s account in installments and send the court certified account statements covering the previous six months.

Order

Kruppenbacher submitted the complaint with a handwritten application to proceed without paying fees upfront and a prisoner authorization. The court ordered him, within 30 days of the order, either to pay the $400 in fees or fully complete and submit the amended application and prisoner authorization forms provided by the court.

The court directed the clerk to assign the matter to the judge’s docket, mail Kruppenbacher a copy of the order, and note service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time. The court stated that failure to comply within the allowed time would result in dismissal without prejudice, meaning the order did not bar refiling.

The court certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. It also cautioned that a later dismissal for frivolousness, maliciousness, or failure to state a claim could count as a strike under the prisoner-filing statute.

Ruling and classification

Chief United States District Judge Colleen McMahon issued an order requiring updated fee-related filings or payment before the action could proceed. The order did not address whether Kruppenbacher’s underlying claims were legally valid. It is therefore a procedural order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.