Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 6, 2020

Frost v. N.Y.P.D.

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:20-cv-00027
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Frost v. N.Y.P.D., Judge McMahon dismissed Yvonne Frost’s case without prejudice because she filed without required permission to proceed without paying fees.

Who this affects

Yvonne Frost’s case was dismissed without prejudice, and she was denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal. The opinion does not adjudicate the claims against the defendants.

What happened

In Frost v. N.Y.P.D., Yvonne Frost filed a new case without a lawyer and asked to proceed without paying filing fees. The court had previously ordered that she obtain permission before filing any new case under that status.

Frost had not obtained that permission before filing this case. The opinion does not discuss the substance of her claims against the listed defendants.

Chief Judge Colleen McMahon dismissed the action without prejudice because Frost did not follow the earlier order. The court also denied fee-free status for any appeal, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Frost v. N.Y.P.D. · No. 1:20-cv-00027
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Jan. 6, 2020

Background

Yvonne Frost filed this case without a lawyer against N.Y.P.D.; City of New York (HRA); CVR Associates Inc.; Bronx Supreme Court; and United States SD Court. She requested permission to proceed without paying filing fees. The court stated that, in a November 7, 2019 order, Frost had been barred from filing any new action under that status unless she first obtained the court’s permission.

Reason for Dismissal

Frost had not requested or obtained that permission before filing this case. The court therefore dismissed the action without prejudice for failing to comply with the November 7, 2019 order. The opinion does not address the merits of Frost’s claims.

Appeal and Service

The court directed the Clerk of Court to send Frost a copy of the order and record service on the docket. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), the court certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal.

Disposition

Chief United States District Judge Colleen McMahon dismissed the action without prejudice. The dismissal was based on Frost’s failure to obtain the required permission before filing, not on a decision about the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.