Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 8, 2020

Munoz v. United States

Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Docket
1:19-cv-11907
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Munoz v. United States, Judge Batts ordered pro se movant Jeremias Munoz to resubmit a signed motion page within 30 days.

Who this affects

Jeremias Munoz must provide an original signature on the motion’s signature page within 30 days; the Clerk of Court must mail him the order and record service.

What happened

In Munoz v. United States, Jeremias Munoz filed a motion without a signature while representing himself. The attached form identifies the motion as one seeking relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and asks to vacate his conviction.

The court explained that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(a) and a local rule require an unrepresented party to personally sign a written motion. The court also cited the Supreme Court’s explanation that the signature must be handwritten or a handwritten mark.

The court did not decide whether Munoz was entitled to relief from his conviction. Judge Batts directed him to resubmit the motion’s signature page with an original signature within 30 days of the order. The Clerk was directed to mail him a copy of the order and record service on the docket.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Munoz v. United States · No. 1:19-cv-11907
Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Date
Jan. 8, 2020

Background

Jeremias Munoz, the movant, brought the action without a lawyer. The opinion concerns a motion that was submitted without a signature. The attached form identifies the motion as arising under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and states that Munoz sought to vacate his conviction or obtain other relief.

Court’s Analysis

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(a) requires every written motion to be signed by an attorney of record or, when a party is unrepresented, by the party personally. The court also cited Local Civil Rule 11.1(a). Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Becker v. Montgomery, the court stated that the required signature must be handwritten or a handwritten mark. The court did not address the merits of Munoz’s request to vacate his conviction.

Disposition

The court directed Munoz to resubmit the motion’s signature page with an original signature within 30 days of the order’s date. The Clerk of Court was directed to mail a copy of the order to Munoz and note service on the docket. Judge Deborah A. Batts therefore issued a procedural directive concerning the motion’s required signature; the opinion does not state that the motion was granted or denied.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.