Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 9, 2020

Baskerville v. Commissioner of Social Security

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:20-cv-00144
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Social SecurityCivil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Baskerville v. Commissioner, Judge McMahon transferred the Social Security case to the Eastern District of New York because venue was improper in Manhattan.

Who this affects

Keyonda Baskerville, acting on behalf of I.S.B., must pursue the action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York rather than the Southern District of New York.

What happened

In Baskerville v. Commissioner of Social Security, Keyonda Baskerville, representing herself and acting for I.S.B., sought review of a decision denying her minor child’s application for disability benefits.

The Southern District of New York ruled that the case belonged in the Eastern District of New York because Baskerville resides in King County, New York, which is within that district. The court therefore transferred the action rather than deciding whether the benefits denial was correct.

Judge Colleen McMahon ordered the transfer, directed the clerk to mail the order to Baskerville, and closed the case in the Southern District of New York. The court also said that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying filing fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Baskerville v. Commissioner of Social Security · No. 1:20-cv-00144
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Jan. 9, 2020

Background

Keyonda Baskerville brought this self-represented action on behalf of I.S.B. to seek judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision denying the minor child’s application for disability benefits. The action invoked 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and/or 1383(c)(3), which provide for judicial review of certain Social Security decisions.

Venue

The court explained that a case under those provisions may be filed in the federal district where the plaintiff resides, among other circumstances. The opinion states that Baskerville resides in King County, New York, which is within the Eastern District of New York. It therefore concluded that venue was not proper in the Southern District of New York and that venue was proper in the Eastern District.

Ruling

The court transferred the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), which permits transfer when venue is improper. The clerk was directed to mail the order to Baskerville, and a summons was not to issue from the Southern District. The order closed the case in that district. The court also certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying filing fees. The opinion did not decide whether the denial of disability benefits was legally correct.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.