Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 9, 2020

National Jewish Democratic Council v. Adelson

Judge
James Oetken
Docket
1:18-cv-08787
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Fee PetitionCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In National Jewish Democratic Council v. Adelson, Judge Oetken denied the plaintiffs’ request for interim costs and attorney’s fees because they had not yet obtained qualifying relief.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs, National Jewish Democratic Council and the other listed plaintiffs, were denied interim costs and attorney’s fees. The order also addressed the effect of the plaintiffs’ earlier partial summary-judgment ruling against Sheldon G. Adelson.

What happened

In National Jewish Democratic Council v. Adelson, the plaintiffs asked for costs and attorney’s fees while the case was still pending. The court had previously ruled for them only on liability, without awarding damages or another form of relief.

The court said costs generally go to a party that has received an enforceable judgment or comparable relief. It also found that the plaintiffs did not qualify as a prevailing party for interim attorney’s fees. The court did not decide whether Nevada’s anti-SLAPP law permits interim fees because the plaintiffs did not meet that standard in any event.

Judge Oetken denied the plaintiffs’ motion for interim costs and attorney’s fees. The opinion does not state that the underlying case was dismissed or otherwise resolved by this order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
National Jewish Democratic Council v. Adelson · No. 1:18-cv-08787
Judge
James Oetken
Date
Jan. 9, 2020

Background

The plaintiffs moved for an interim award of costs and attorney’s fees while the case was pending. The court had previously granted the plaintiffs partial summary judgment, but that ruling addressed only liability. The plaintiffs had not received damages, nominal damages, an enforceable judgment, or another form of relief identified by the court.

Costs

The court applied Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d), which generally allows costs to the prevailing party. The court explained that a prevailing party must obtain an enforceable judgment, comparable relief through a settlement or consent decree, or some other relief on the merits. Because the plaintiffs had obtained only a ruling on liability and no cognizable relief, they had not yet prevailed. The court therefore held that Rule 54(d) barred an interim award of costs at that point.

Attorney’s Fees

The court said Nevada law governed the availability of an interim award of attorney’s fees because the plaintiffs relied on Nevada’s anti-SLAPP statute. The court noted that the statute allows a person targeted by a qualifying action to bring a separate action to recover attorney’s fees and costs, but does not expressly use the term “prevailing party.” The plaintiffs asked the court to read that standard into the statute.

The court did not decide whether Nevada’s statute authorizes interim fees or incorporates a prevailing-party requirement. It held that, regardless, the plaintiffs did not qualify as a prevailing party because they had not obtained the required relief on the merits.

Disposition

The court denied the plaintiffs’ motion for an interim award of costs and attorney’s fees. This order did not state that the underlying case was dismissed or otherwise resolved.

Judge

The order was issued by J. Paul Oetken, United States District Judge.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.