Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 9, 2020

Frazier v. Morgan Stanley & Co, LLC

Judge
Richard Sullivan
Docket
1:16-cv-00804
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Frazier v. Morgan Stanley, Judge Sullivan dismissed Andrew Clark’s claims with prejudice after settlement and retained jurisdiction to enforce it.

Who this affects

Andrew Clark’s claims against Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC, and Morgan Stanley were dismissed with prejudice and without costs, and the action was terminated as to Clark. The Court retained jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement.

What happened

In Frazier v. Morgan Stanley & Co., LLC, the parties informed the court that plaintiff Andrew Clark and the defendants had reached a settlement.

The court ordered Clark’s claims dismissed with prejudice and without costs. It also directed the Clerk to terminate the action as to Clark.

Judge Richard J. Sullivan retained jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement and issued the order while sitting by designation.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Frazier v. Morgan Stanley & Co, LLC · No. 1:16-cv-00804
Judge
Richard Sullivan
Date
Jan. 9, 2020

Background

The parties submitted a notice informing the Court that Plaintiff Andrew Clark and Defendants had reached a settlement. The opinion does not state the settlement’s terms.

Ruling

The Court ordered that Clark’s claims be dismissed with prejudice and without costs. “With prejudice” means the claims cannot be brought again. The Court also retained jurisdiction, meaning continuing authority, to enforce the settlement agreement. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate the action as to Clark.

Judge and disposition

Richard J. Sullivan, a United States Circuit Judge sitting by designation, issued the order. The order resolved the case only as to Andrew Clark; the opinion does not state what happened to the claims of the other plaintiffs or parties.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.