Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 9, 2020

Lopez v. Dennis

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:19-cv-09276
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Lopez v. Dennis, Judge McMahon dismissed Lopez’s complaint without prejudice after he failed to pay fees or submit required forms.

Who this affects

Jason Lopez’s complaint was dismissed without prejudice, and he was denied permission to appeal without paying the required fees.

What happened

In Lopez v. Dennis, Jason Lopez sued C.O. Dennis and other defendants while he was detained at the Manhattan Detention Complex.

The court ordered Lopez to pay the filing fees or submit an application to proceed without paying them, along with a required prisoner authorization. The order was returned because Lopez was no longer at the facility, and he did not provide a new mailing address or contact the court.

The court dismissed the complaint without prejudice. Judge Colleen McMahon also denied Lopez permission to appeal without paying fees, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Lopez v. Dennis · No. 1:19-cv-09276
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Jan. 9, 2020

Background

Jason Lopez filed a complaint against C.O. Dennis and other defendants while he was detained at the Manhattan Detention Complex. The court had ordered Lopez to either pay the $400 filing fee or submit a completed application to proceed without paying the fee, together with a prisoner authorization, within 30 days.

The court’s November 8, 2019 order was returned on December 4, 2019, with a notation that Lopez was no longer held at the facility. Lopez did not comply with the order, notify the court of a new mailing address, or otherwise contact the court.

Ruling

The court dismissed Lopez’s complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914 and 1915. A dismissal without prejudice does not bar refiling, although the opinion does not discuss any requirements for a new filing.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Lopez permission to appeal without paying the required fees. The Clerk of Court was directed to mail Lopez a copy of the order and record service on the docket.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.