Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 10, 2020

Bob v. DHS

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:19-cv-10422
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
HabeasCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Nata S. Bob v. DHS/ICE/INS, Judge McMahon dismissed the petition without prejudice after Bob neither paid the fee nor submitted a fee-waiver application.

Who this affects

Nata S. Bob’s petition was dismissed without prejudice because he neither submitted the required fee-waiver application nor paid the $5 filing fee. His request to proceed without paying fees on appeal was also denied.

What happened

Nata S. Bob filed a petition asking the court to review his detention. The court had directed him to submit an application to proceed without paying the filing fee or to pay the required $5 fee within 30 days.

Bob did neither. The opinion does not address the underlying issues in his petition.

Judge Colleen McMahon dismissed the petition without prejudice. She also denied Bob permission to proceed without paying fees for an appeal, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Bob v. DHS · No. 1:19-cv-10422
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Jan. 10, 2020

Background

Nata S. Bob filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, a court petition challenging detention. In an order dated November 12, 2019, the court directed Bob, within 30 days, either to submit a completed application to proceed without paying the filing fee or to pay the $5 filing fee required for the petition.

Court’s Ruling

Bob did not submit the application or pay the fee. The court therefore dismissed the petition without prejudice, meaning the dismissal did not bar refiling. The court also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying fees for an appeal. The opinion did not reach the substance of Bob’s petition.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.