Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 10, 2020

Morales v. Three Diamond Diner Corp.

Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Docket
7:19-cv-03460
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Morales v. Three Diamond Diner, Judge Briccetti approved the parties’ Fair Labor Standards Act settlement and ordered the case closed.

Who this affects

The settlement affects the named plaintiffs, the defendants, and the other individuals identified in the case as similarly situated. The case was closed after the court approved the agreement.

What happened

In Morales v. Three Diamond Diner Corp., the parties submitted a settlement in this Fair Labor Standards Act case for the court’s review. The plaintiffs included Julissa Morales, Aidee Geronimo-Romero, and Ady Garcia, individually and as representatives of others similarly situated.

The court considered the parties’ valuation of the claims, the risks and costs of continued litigation, the plaintiffs’ representation by counsel, mediation, the settlement’s neutral-reference and confidentiality provisions, the discounted wage recovery, and the scope of the release. The court found the agreement fair, reasonable, and reached through arm’s-length negotiations without fraud or collusion. It also found the attorneys’ fees—one-ninth of the total recovery—fair and reasonable.

Judge Vincent L. Briccetti approved the settlement agreement and instructed the Clerk to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Morales v. Three Diamond Diner Corp. · No. 7:19-cv-03460
Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Date
Jan. 10, 2020

Background

The plaintiffs brought this Fair Labor Standards Act case against Three Diamond Diner Corp., doing business as Mount Kisco Diner, and Photios Georgiou, Charalambos Georgiou, and Yiota Georgiou. The caption identifies the plaintiffs as proceeding individually and on behalf of others similarly situated as class representatives.

On January 7, 2020, the parties filed a settlement agreement and a joint statement explaining its basis. The filing was made in response to the requirement for court review of Fair Labor Standards Act settlements under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc.

Court’s Review

The court considered the parties’ positions about the proper value of the plaintiffs’ claims; the risks and costs of continued litigation; the fact that the plaintiffs were represented by counsel; the fact that the plaintiffs no longer worked for the defendants; and the parties’ use of an experienced mediator.

The court also considered the agreement’s neutral-reference provision, the absence of a confidentiality provision, and the discounted wage recovery, which was estimated based on the plaintiffs’ recollections. The parties wanted to resolve the case early and avoid the costs and uncertainty of extended litigation. Although the release was broad, it preserved Julissa Morales’s claims against the defendants that were included in an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission charge dated on or about September 4, 2019.

Ruling

Judge Vincent L. Briccetti found that the settlement agreement was fair and reasonable and resulted from arm’s-length negotiations rather than fraud or collusion. The court also found that the attorneys’ fees, equal to one-ninth of the total recovery, were fair and reasonable under the circumstances.

The court approved the parties’ settlement agreement. The Clerk was instructed to close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.