Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 14, 2020

Johnson v. Wendy's Restaurant Corporation

Judge
Alison Nathan
Docket
1:19-cv-08157
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Robert W. Johnson v. Wendys Corporation, Judge Nathan ordered U.S. Marshals to serve defendants after Johnson was allowed to proceed without paying fees.

Who this affects

Robert W. Johnson, the self-represented plaintiff, and Wendys Corporation, Julie Lopez, and Great Lakes Management, LLC, the defendants to be served.

What happened

Robert W. Johnson sued Wendys Corporation, Julie Lopez, and Great Lakes Management, LLC, bringing claims under federal and state law. He was representing himself and had already been allowed to proceed without paying court fees.

Judge Nathan directed the Clerk of Court to issue summonses, complete service forms, and provide the required documents to the U.S. Marshals Service. The court extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summonses are issued.

The order did not decide whether Johnson’s claims were valid. Judge Alison J. Nathan also required Johnson to notify the court of any address change and directed that a copy of the order and an information package be sent to him.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Johnson v. Wendy's Restaurant Corporation · No. 1:19-cv-08157
Judge
Alison Nathan
Date
Jan. 14, 2020

Background

Robert W. Johnson filed claims under federal and state law against Wendys Corporation, Julie Lopez, and Great Lakes Management, LLC. The opinion states that Johnson appeared without a lawyer. In an earlier order dated November 10, 2019, the court allowed him to proceed without prepaying court fees, a status commonly called proceeding in forma pauperis.

Service of the defendants

Because Johnson had that fee-waiver status, the court explained that he could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants with the summonses and amended complaint. The court extended the usual 90-day service period until 90 days after the summonses for the defendants are issued. If the amended complaint is not served within that period, the opinion says Johnson should ask for more time.

The court instructed the Clerk of Court to issue summonses for Wendys Corporation, Julie Lopez, and Great Lakes Management, LLC; complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for each defendant; and deliver the necessary documents to the Marshals Service. The opinion also requires Johnson to notify the court if his address changes and states that the court may dismiss the action if he fails to do so.

Disposition

Judge Alison J. Nathan ordered the Clerk of Court to take the listed steps so the Marshals Service could serve the defendants. This was an order about starting service of the lawsuit, not a decision on the merits of Johnson’s federal or state-law claims. The court also directed that the order and an information package be mailed to Johnson.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.