Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 16, 2020

Brito v. Clark

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:20-cv-00228
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Brito v. Clark, Judge McMahon ordered Raymond Brito to pay fees or submit complete forms within 30 days, or the action will be dismissed.

Who this affects

Raymond Brito, whose case must satisfy the payment or filing requirements before it will be processed; the order also affects the timing of service on SGT. Clark because no summons issued at that time.

What happened

Brito v. Clark was brought by Raymond Brito, who is incarcerated and proceeding without a lawyer. His filing included an incomplete and unsigned application to proceed without prepaying fees and no prisoner authorization.

The court gave Brito 30 days to either pay $400 in fees or submit completed forms authorizing payment from his account. The court also directed that no summons issue at that time and warned that failing to comply would result in dismissal of the action.

Judge Colleen McMahon also ruled that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Brito v. Clark · No. 1:20-cv-00228
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Jan. 16, 2020

Background

Raymond Brito filed this civil action while incarcerated at Marcy Correctional Facility and is representing himself. He submitted a complaint with an incomplete, unsigned application to proceed without prepaying fees and did not submit a prisoner authorization.

Fee and filing requirements

The court explained that a prisoner filing a civil action must either pay $400 in fees—$350 for the filing fee and $50 for the administrative fee—or submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying fees, along with a prisoner authorization. If the court grants that application, the $350 filing fee must be collected in installments from the prisoner's account. The authorization also directs the correctional facility to deduct those payments and provide certified account statements for the previous six months.

Order

Within 30 days of the order, Brito must either pay the $400 in fees or submit the attached application and prisoner authorization forms. The forms must identify docket number 20-CV-228 (CM). The Clerk of Court was directed to mail the order to Brito and record service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time. The court stated that, if Brito complies, the case will be processed under the Clerk's Office procedures; if he does not comply within the allowed time, the action will be dismissed.

Appeal and warning

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The court also cautioned that a later dismissal for frivolousness or failure to state a claim could count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), affecting a prisoner's ability to proceed without prepaying fees in future actions. Judge Colleen McMahon signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.