Coston v. NYS DOCCS
- Colleen McMahon
- 1:20-cv-00350
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Coston v. NYC DOCCS, Judge McMahon ordered the incarcerated plaintiff to pay filing fees or submit forms seeking permission to proceed without prepayment.
Ashante Coston, the incarcerated plaintiff, was required to pay the fees or submit the required forms before the case could proceed.
What happened
In Coston v. NYC DOCCS, Ashante Coston, who was incarcerated and had no lawyer, sent the court a letter about an event on December 27, 2019. The Clerk’s Office treated the letter as a complaint and opened a civil case.
The court said Coston had to either pay $400 in filing and administrative fees or submit a signed application to proceed without paying the fees upfront, along with a form authorizing deductions from his prison account. The court gave him 30 days to do so and said no summons would issue yet.
Judge Colleen McMahon ordered the Clerk’s Office to send Coston the order and process the case if he complied. She stated that the action would be dismissed if he did not comply, and denied permission to appeal without paying fees because an appeal would not be taken in good faith.
The detailed version
- Coston v. NYS DOCCS · No. 1:20-cv-00350
- Colleen McMahon
- Jan. 16, 2020
Background
Ashante Coston, appearing without a lawyer and incarcerated at Downstate Correctional Facility, submitted a letter concerning an event that occurred on December 27, 2019. The Clerk’s Office treated the letter as a complaint and opened this civil action against NYC DOCCS.
Fee and IFP requirements
The court explained that a prisoner filing a civil action must either pay $400 in fees—$350 for filing and $50 for administration—or request permission to proceed without prepaying the fees. That request is made by submitting a signed application to proceed without prepayment, commonly called an IFP application, and a prisoner authorization.
The prisoner authorization allows the court to collect the $350 filing fee in installments from the prisoner’s account and requires the facility to send the court certified account statements for the preceding six months. The $50 administrative fee does not apply to a person granted permission to proceed without prepayment.
Order
The court ordered Coston, within 30 days of January 16, 2020, to either pay the $400 in fees or submit the completed IFP application and prisoner authorization labeled with docket number 20-CV-350. The Clerk’s Office was directed to assign the matter to Judge Colleen McMahon’s docket, mail Coston a copy of the order, and note service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time.
The order stated that, if Coston complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office’s procedures. If he failed to comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed. The court also certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The court cautioned that a later dismissal for frivolousness or failure to state a claim could count as a strike under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, potentially limiting a prisoner’s ability to proceed without prepaying fees in future cases.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.