Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 17, 2020

DeBlasio v. Williams

Judge
Katherine Failla
Docket
1:19-cv-00201
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
6
Civil ProcedureDiscoveryPro Se
In one sentence

In DeBlasio v. Williams, Judge Failla ordered service on Dr. Williams and identification of unknown officers, while denying fee-free status for any appeal.

Who this affects

Philip E. DeBlasio, Dr. Williams, Officer Simon, the two unidentified correctional officers, the City of New York, and the U.S. Marshals Service were affected by the service, identification, discovery, and appeal-fee directives.

What happened

In DeBlasio v. Williams, Philip E. DeBlasio, representing himself, brought civil-rights claims under a federal law against Dr. Williams, Officer Simon, and two unidentified correctional officers. The claims arose from an alleged incident at the Clinical Alternative to Punitive Segregation program at Rikers Island.

The court said DeBlasio could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve Dr. Williams because he had permission to proceed without paying filing fees. It also extended the service deadline and required Dr. Williams to answer standard prisoner-case discovery requests. Because DeBlasio had not identified Officer Simon or the two unidentified officers, the court ordered New York City to provide names and badge numbers from its records and investigations.

Judge Katherine Polk Failla ordered the Clerk to prepare the service paperwork for Dr. Williams and ordered the City to provide the officer information by February 27, 2020. The court denied permission to proceed without paying fees for an appeal, stating that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. This order did not decide whether DeBlasio’s underlying claims were legally valid.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
DeBlasio v. Williams · No. 1:19-cv-00201
Judge
Katherine Failla
Date
Jan. 17, 2020

Background

Philip E. DeBlasio filed the action representing himself. He alleged claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 arising from an incident on December 21, 2018, at the Clinical Alternative to Punitive Segregation program in the Anna M. Kross Center at Rikers Island. The defendants were identified in the complaint as Doctor Williams, Correctional Officer Simon, and two correctional officers identified only as John Doe.

The court had previously allowed DeBlasio to proceed without paying filing fees. It ordered service-related steps and directed Corporation Counsel for the City of New York to identify the John Doe officers. The court later learned that Doctor Williams was Erin Williams, a physician employed by New York City Health + Hospitals Correctional Health Services. Corporation Counsel reported that it could not identify Officer Simon and requested physical descriptions of the John Doe officers. DeBlasio did not provide additional identifying information for Simon or either John Doe officer.

Service on Dr. Williams

Because DeBlasio was proceeding without paying filing fees, the court explained that he could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the summons and complaint. The court extended the time for service until 90 days after the summons was issued. It stated that, if service was not completed within that period, DeBlasio should request an extension of time.

The court instructed the Clerk to complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form, issue a summons, and provide the Marshals Service with the documents needed to serve Dr. Williams. The court also determined that Local Civil Rule 33.2 applied. Under that rule, Dr. Williams had to respond within 120 days of the order to the standard prisoner-case interrogatories and document requests, quoting each request verbatim in the response.

Identifying the Other Officers

Rather than dismissing the claims against the unidentified defendants, the court ordered the City of New York to provide the court and DeBlasio with a list of the names and badge numbers of officers identified in Department of Correction reports or other City or Department investigations as having been involved in the alleged incident. The deadline was February 27, 2020.

Disposition

Judge Katherine Polk Failla ordered the Clerk to prepare service materials for Dr. Williams and ordered the City of New York to provide the requested officer-identification list. The court certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying filing fees for an appeal. The order addressed service, discovery, and identifying defendants; it did not rule on the merits of DeBlasio’s underlying civil-rights claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 6-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.