Sharpe v. Moss
- Colleen McMahon
- 1:20-cv-00241
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
In Sharpe v. Moss, Judge McMahon transferred the case to the Eastern District of New York because venue was improper in this court.
Sheaia Sharpe and N.S.D.; Kenneth Moss and the other defendants; and the handling of the complaint and future filings.
What happened
Sheaia Sharpe, representing herself without a lawyer, filed Sharpe v. Moss for herself and her infant, N.S.D. She invoked diversity jurisdiction and alleged that the defendants violated their rights in Staten Island, New York.
The court found that venue was not proper in this court because the plaintiffs did not allege that any defendant lived here or that a substantial part of the events occurred here. The claims arose in Richmond County, which is in the Eastern District of New York.
Judge Colleen McMahon ordered the case transferred to that district, restricted access to the complaint because it included the infant’s full name, and required initials in future filings. The order also closed this case, directed that no summons issue, and denied permission to proceed without paying fees on appeal.
The detailed version
- Sharpe v. Moss · No. 1:20-cv-00241
- Colleen McMahon
- Jan. 17, 2020
Background
Sheaia Sharpe, appearing without a lawyer, brought this action for herself and her infant, identified in the caption as N.S.D. She invoked diversity jurisdiction and alleged that the defendants violated her and N.S.D.’s rights in Staten Island, New York.
Protection of the Minor’s Name
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(a)(3) requires court filings referring to a minor to use only the minor’s initials. Because the complaint included the infant’s full name, the court directed the Clerk of Court to restrict electronic access to the complaint to case participants. The court also instructed Sharpe to use the minor’s initials in any additional filings.
Venue and Transfer
Venue is the federal district where a civil action may properly be heard. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b), venue may generally be based on where a defendant resides or where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims occurred.
The court stated that the plaintiffs were residents of Staten Island and that the claims concerned events in Staten Island, Richmond County, New York. It found that the plaintiffs had not alleged that any defendant resided in this district or that a substantial part of the relevant events occurred here. Because Richmond County is in the Eastern District of New York, the court concluded that venue lay there and transferred the action under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a).
Order
Judge Colleen McMahon directed the Clerk to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The order also directed the Clerk to mail a copy to Sharpe, note service on the docket, restrict access to the complaint, and issue no summons from this court. The order stated that it closed this case.
The court certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying filing fees for purposes of an appeal.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.