Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 17, 2020

Smith v. Sanyo Corporation

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:19-cv-10516
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

Judge McMahon dismissed Smith v. Sanyo Corporation without prejudice because Smith sought fee-free filing without required court permission.

Who this affects

Charmane Smith's case was dismissed without prejudice because she did not obtain the required permission before filing a new case while seeking to proceed without paying filing fees. Sanyo Corporation was the defendant.

What happened

In Smith v. Sanyo Corporation, Charmane Smith filed a new case without a lawyer and asked to proceed without paying filing fees.

A 2016 court order required Smith to obtain permission before filing any new case under that procedure. Smith had not requested that permission.

Chief Judge Colleen McMahon dismissed the case without prejudice for violating the earlier order and denied fee-free status for any appeal, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Smith v. Sanyo Corporation · No. 1:19-cv-10516
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Jan. 17, 2020

Background

Charmane Smith filed this new case without a lawyer and requested permission to proceed without paying filing fees, a status commonly called proceeding in forma pauperis. The opinion states that, on December 2, 2016, Smith had been barred from filing any new case under that procedure unless she first obtained permission from the court.

Reason for dismissal

Smith had not requested the required permission before filing this action. The court therefore dismissed the action without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1651 for failure to comply with the December 2, 2016 order. The opinion does not decide the underlying claims against Sanyo Corporation.

Other ruling

Chief Judge Colleen McMahon directed the Clerk of Court to mail the order to Smith and record service on the docket. The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.