Washington v. Griffin
- Lorna Schofield
- 1:17-cv-03849
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Washington v. Griffin, Judge Schofield adopted the magistrate judge’s recommendation, dismissed the habeas petition, and declined a certificate of appealability.
Phillip Washington’s petition was dismissed in its entirety. The court also declined to issue him a certificate of appealability.
What happened
Washington filed a petition seeking federal relief from custody without a lawyer. Griffin filed an opposition, and Washington filed a reply.
A magistrate judge recommended dismissing the petition in full. The opinion says the district court reviewed that recommendation for clear error and found none.
Judge Lorna G. Schofield adopted the recommendation in full, dismissed the petition in its entirety, and declined to issue a certificate of appealability.
The detailed version
- Washington v. Griffin · No. 1:17-cv-03849
- Lorna Schofield
- Jan. 17, 2020
Background
Phillip Washington filed a petition for habeas relief without a lawyer on May 16, 2017. Thomas Griffin, identified as the superintendent, filed a brief opposing the petition, and Washington filed a reply.
Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation
The matter had been referred to a magistrate judge for a habeas-corpus proceeding. On December 23, 2019, Magistrate Judge Cave issued a Report and Recommendation advising that the petition be dismissed in its entirety.
District Court’s Review and Ruling
The district court stated that, when no timely objection is made to a magistrate judge’s recommendation, the district court reviews the record for clear error. The opinion states that the Report and Recommendation was reviewed under that standard and that no clear error was found. The opinion does not explain the underlying reasons for the recommended dismissal because it does not include the Report and Recommendation’s analysis.
Judge Lorna G. Schofield adopted the Report and Recommendation in full and dismissed the petition in its entirety. The court also declined to issue a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 because Washington had not made the required substantial showing that a constitutional right was denied. The Clerk of Court was directed to mail Washington a copy of the order.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.