Farouk v. NY DOE
- Paul Gardephe
- 1:20-cv-00418
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 4
In Farouk v. New York City Department of Education, Judge Netburn ordered Marshals service and extended the service deadline; the court did not decide discrimination claims.
The order primarily affects Akesode Ademola Farouk and the New York City Department of Education, Dyon Rozier, Paulette Christie, and Erika Tobia by arranging service of the lawsuit and setting the service deadline. It does not determine the merits of Farouk’s claims.
What happened
In Farouk v. New York City Department of Education, Akesode Ademola Farouk, proceeding without a lawyer, alleged that his employer discriminated against him based on race and Nigerian national origin. He also brought claims under several federal and state laws, including laws concerning family leave and disabilities.
Because Farouk was allowed to proceed without paying the filing fee, the court explained that the U.S. Marshals Service would handle service of the summons and complaint. The court extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summons is issued and instructed Farouk to notify the court if his address changes.
Judge Sarah Netburn ordered the Clerk of Court to prepare service forms, issue the summons, and give the necessary papers to the Marshals Service for service on the New York City Department of Education and the individual defendants. The order did not decide whether Farouk’s claims were valid, and it denied fee-free status for any appeal from this order.
The detailed version
- Farouk v. NY DOE · No. 1:20-cv-00418
- Paul Gardephe
- Jan. 21, 2020
Background
Akesode Ademola Farouk brought the action without a lawyer. He alleged employment discrimination based on race and Nigerian national origin under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, and the New York State Human Rights Law. He also asserted claims under the Family and Medical Leave Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Rehabilitation Act.
The court had previously allowed Farouk to proceed without paying the filing fee. In such cases, federal law requires the court to arrange service of the summons and complaint through the U.S. Marshals Service after the court reviews the complaint and orders issuance of a summons.
Service of Process
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) generally requires service within 90 days after the complaint is filed. The court held that this deadline should instead be extended for Farouk because he could not serve the defendants until the court reviewed the complaint and ordered a summons issued. The court extended the service period to 90 days after the summons is issued.
The court stated that if service is not completed within that period, Farouk should request an extension of time. It also directed Farouk to notify the court in writing if his address changes and warned that the action could be dismissed if he fails to do so.
Order
Judge Sarah Netburn directed the Clerk of Court to complete U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return forms for the New York City Department of Education, Principal Dyon Rozier, Assistant Principal Paulette Christie, and Superintendent Erika Tobia. The Clerk was also directed to issue the summons and deliver all necessary documents to the U.S. Marshals Service so those defendants could be served.
The order did not rule on the merits of Farouk’s discrimination, leave, or disability claims. The court also certified that an appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying the filing fee.
Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.