Cousar v. Lynch
- Colleen McMahon
- 1:20-cv-00639
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Cousar v. Lynch, Judge McMahon ordered an updated prisoner authorization or $400 payment within 30 days before the case could proceed.
Saeed M. Cousar and the continuation of his action in the Southern District of New York; the order required him to pay the fees or submit a corrected prisoner authorization.
What happened
In Cousar v. Lynch, Saeed M. Cousar, an incarcerated person representing himself, submitted an application to proceed without paying court fees upfront and a prisoner authorization form.
The authorization directed deductions from his prison account to the District of New Jersey, rather than this court. The order required him within 30 days to either pay $400 or submit a corrected authorization labeled with this case’s docket number.
Judge Colleen McMahon directed the Clerk to mail the order to Cousar, stated that no summons would issue yet, and warned that the action would be dismissed if he did not comply. The judge also denied fee-free status for any appeal from the order.
The detailed version
- Cousar v. Lynch · No. 1:20-cv-00639
- Colleen McMahon
- Jan. 24, 2020
Background
Saeed M. Cousar, who was incarcerated at Southern State Correctional Facility in New Jersey, brought this action without a lawyer. He submitted an application to proceed without prepaying court fees and a prisoner authorization. Under the cited federal statutes, a prisoner seeking this status must authorize installment deductions from the prison account for the filing fee and provide certified account statements for the previous six months.
Problem with the Authorization
Cousar’s authorization allowed funds from his prison account to be sent to the District of New Jersey. Because this case was filed in the Southern District of New York, the authorization was not sufficient for this action. The order explained that the total fees were $400: a $350 filing fee and a $50 administrative fee. The $50 administrative fee would not apply if the court granted permission to proceed without prepaying fees.
Order
The court ordered Cousar, within 30 days of the order, to either pay the $400 in fees or complete and submit the attached prisoner authorization directing payments for this case. The authorization had to include docket number 20-CV-639 (CM). The Clerk was directed to mail the order to Cousar and record service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time. The order stated that the action would be dismissed if Cousar failed to comply within the allowed period.
The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for that appeal. The order further cautioned that a later dismissal as frivolous or for failure to state a claim could count as a statutory “strike.” This order addressed filing-fee and authorization requirements; it did not decide the merits of Cousar’s claims against the defendants.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.