Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 28, 2020

Broker Genius Inc. v. Seat Scouts LLC

Judge
Sidney Stein
Docket
1:17-cv-08627
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Broker Genius v. Seat Scouts, Judge Stein allowed Broker Genius to register its judgment in other federal districts where defendants had assets.

Who this affects

Broker Genius may pursue registration and enforcement of its judgment in the listed federal districts. Seat Scouts LLC and Drew Gainor are subject to that registration and enforcement because the court found assets outside New York and good cause under 28 U.S.C. § 1963.

What happened

In Broker Genius Inc. v. Seat Scouts LLC, Broker Genius asked the court to certify a $3 million contract judgment against Drew Gainor and a $1.5 million unfair-competition judgment against Gainor and Seat Scouts for registration in other federal districts. The defendants had appealed but had not posted a bond or obtained a pause in enforcement.

Broker Genius said its investigation found no defendants’ assets in New York but found assets outside New York. The court also noted concerns raised by judges about possible transfers involving Pistol Enterprises LLC that could make the judgment harder to collect.

Judge Sidney H. Stein found good cause under federal law and granted Broker Genius’s motion. He directed the Clerk of Court to certify the January 22, 2019 judgment and permitted Broker Genius to register it in the District of Nebraska, District of Delaware, District of Massachusetts, Eastern District of North Carolina, and Northern District of California.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Broker Genius Inc. v. Seat Scouts LLC · No. 1:17-cv-08627
Judge
Sidney Stein
Date
Jan. 28, 2020

Background

After a ten-day jury trial, the court entered a January 22, 2019 judgment awarding Broker Genius $3,000,000 against Drew Gainor on a breach-of-contract claim and $1,500,000 against Gainor and Seat Scouts LLC on an unfair-competition claim. The defendants filed a notice of appeal. They did not post a bond or obtain a stay, so Broker Genius remained free to enforce the judgment.

Broker Genius sought an order under 28 U.S.C. § 1963 directing the Clerk of Court to certify the judgment and allowing Broker Genius to register it in other federal districts where the defendants had assets. The requested districts included the District of Nebraska, District of Delaware, District of Massachusetts, Eastern District of North Carolina, and Northern District of California. Seat Scouts and Gainor opposed the request.

Legal standard

Section 1963 permits registration of a federal district court judgment in another federal district after the judgment becomes final through an appeal or expiration of the appeal period. It also permits registration earlier when the court that entered the judgment finds good cause. The court explained that good cause may be shown by evidence that the defendant has substantial property in another district and insufficient property in the district that entered the judgment to satisfy the award.

Court’s analysis

Broker Genius represented that its investigation had found no defendants’ assets in New York. The opposition did not dispute that point. Broker Genius also presented evidence that Gainor and Seat Scouts had assets outside New York. The court found that this evidence established good cause for registration in districts where the defendants had assets.

The court further noted evidence concerning the defendants’ business dealings with Pistol Enterprises LLC after judgment was entered. Two judges had expressed concern that assets might be dissipated or transferred in a way that would prevent Broker Genius from recovering the judgment. The court stated that this evidence was not necessary to establish good cause but further supported its conclusion.

Disposition

Judge Sidney H. Stein granted Broker Genius’s motion. The Clerk of Court was directed to certify the judgment dated January 22, 2019, and Broker Genius was permitted to register the judgment in federal districts where the defendants had assets, including the five districts identified in the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.