Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 30, 2020

Green v. Chappius

Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Docket
7:17-cv-03129
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
HabeasCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Green v. Chappius, Judge Briccetti denied Avery Green’s custody-relief petition after adopting a magistrate judge’s recommendation.

Who this affects

Avery Green’s petition was denied. The order also prevented issuance of a certificate of appealability and denied permission to appeal without paying court fees.

What happened

In Green v. Chappius, Avery Green filed a petition seeking federal relief related to custody. Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy recommended denying the petition in full.

Neither side objected to the recommendation. Judge Briccetti reviewed the recommendation, the petition, and the parties’ submissions, and found no error.

Judge Vincent L. Briccetti adopted the recommendation and denied the petition. The court also declined to issue a certificate allowing an appeal and denied permission to appeal without paying court fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Green v. Chappius · No. 7:17-cv-03129
Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Date
Jan. 30, 2020

Background

Avery Green filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, a court procedure seeking relief related to custody. Magistrate Judge Judith C. McCarthy issued a Report and Recommendation dated November 27, 2019. The recommendation advised the district court to deny the petition in its entirety.

The docket showed that the Clerk mailed Green a copy of the recommendation on December 13, 2019. Neither party filed objections. The district court explained that it had reviewed the recommendation, the petition, and the parties’ submissions and found no error, including no clear error.

Ruling

Judge Vincent L. Briccetti adopted the Report and Recommendation as the court’s opinion and denied the petition. The order does not explain the underlying reason for denying the petition beyond adopting the recommendation.

The court also ruled that Green had not made the required substantial showing that a constitutional right had been denied, so it would not issue a certificate of appealability. It further certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying filing fees. The Clerk was directed to enter judgment and close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.