Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 30, 2020

The Barter House, Inc. v. Infinity Spirits LLC

Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Docket
1:17-cv-09276
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedureSummary Judgment
In one sentence

In The Barter House v. Infinity Spirits, Judge Engelmayer postponed briefing after defense counsel’s death and required corporate defendants to obtain replacement counsel.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs’ partial-summary-judgment briefing schedule was changed. Defendant Brian Hopkins was directed to retain successor counsel for the corporate defendants and, if he wished, for himself. The corporate defendants faced a possible default judgment if counsel did not appear by February 14, 2020.

What happened

The Barter House, Inc. v. Infinity Spirits LLC concerns a scheduling issue after the court learned that defense lawyer Andy Oh had died on January 14, 2020. Defendant Brian Hopkins reported the death in a letter to the court.

The court moved the deadline for defendants’ response to the plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment to February 28, 2020, and set March 6, 2020, for any reply. The trial was to proceed as scheduled.

Judge Engelmayer directed Brian Hopkins to retain replacement counsel for the corporate defendants, which must have lawyers to proceed in federal court. The replacement lawyer had to file a notice of appearance by February 14, 2020; otherwise, the court said it would be required to enter a default judgment against those entities.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
The Barter House, Inc. v. Infinity Spirits LLC · No. 1:17-cv-09276
Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Date
Jan. 30, 2020

Background

The court received an ex parte letter— a communication to the court from one side without the other side’s participation—from defendant Brian Hopkins. The letter reported that defense counsel Andy Oh had died on January 14, 2020. Hopkins also asked for permission to send another letter under seal concerning how the circumstances might have affected the case, but the order does not state that the court ruled on that request.

Order

The court adjourned, or postponed, the briefing deadlines for the plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment. Defendants’ opposition, previously due January 24, 2020, was rescheduled for February 28, 2020. Plaintiffs’ reply, if any, was due March 6, 2020. The court stated that the trial would proceed as scheduled.

The court directed Hopkins to retain successor counsel for the corporate defendants and, if he wished, for himself. It stated that the corporate defendants were required to be represented by counsel to proceed in the case. Successor counsel had to file a notice of appearance by February 14, 2020. The court warned that if counsel for the corporate entities did not appear by that date, it would be obliged to enter a default judgment against those entities. The court also stated that it would email the order to Hopkins in addition to filing it on the public docket.

Disposition and effect

This order changed briefing deadlines and imposed a deadline for corporate defendants to obtain counsel; it did not decide the plaintiffs’ partial-summary-judgment motion. The order was signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on January 30, 2020.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.