Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 31, 2020

Mancia v. State of New York

Judge
Louis Stanton
Docket
1:20-cv-00719
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Mancia v. State of New York, Judge McMahon ordered incarcerated plaintiff Mauricio Antonio (Patino) Mancia to pay fees or submit forms to proceed.

Who this affects

Mauricio Antonio (Patino) Mancia, an incarcerated plaintiff proceeding without a lawyer, was required to pay the fees or submit the specified forms before the case could proceed.

What happened

In Mancia v. State of New York, Mauricio Antonio (Patino) Mancia filed a civil action without a lawyer, filing fees, a completed application to proceed without prepaying fees, or a prisoner authorization.

The court explained that a prisoner must either pay $400 in fees or submit the required forms. If approved to proceed without prepayment, the $350 filing fee would be collected in installments from the prisoner’s account.

Judge McMahon ordered Mancia to pay the fees or submit the forms within 30 days. The court said the case would be dismissed if he did not comply, directed the Clerk to mail him the order, and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Mancia v. State of New York · No. 1:20-cv-00719
Judge
Louis Stanton
Date
Jan. 31, 2020

Background

Mauricio Antonio (Patino) Mancia, who was incarcerated at Marcy Correctional Facility, filed this civil action without a lawyer. He did not submit the filing fees, a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis (without prepaying court fees), or a prisoner authorization.

Court’s Order

The court directed Mancia, within 30 days, to do one of two things: pay $400 in fees, consisting of a $350 filing fee and a $50 administrative fee, or submit the required application and prisoner authorization. The order explained that, if a prisoner’s application to proceed without prepayment is granted, the Prison Litigation Reform Act requires the $350 filing fee to be collected in installments from the prisoner’s account. The prisoner authorization also directs the correctional facility to deduct those payments and provide the court with certified account statements for the previous six months.

The court directed the Clerk to mail Mancia a copy of the order and record service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time. The court stated that the case would be processed if Mancia complied and would be dismissed if he failed to comply within the allowed time. The court also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order cautioned that a later dismissal for frivolousness or failure to state a claim could count as a strike under the prisoner litigation statute.

Disposition

Judge Colleen McMahon directed payment of the fees or submission of the required forms; the order did not dismiss the action at that time. It stated that dismissal would follow if Mancia failed to comply within 30 days.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.