Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 31, 2020

Traynor v. Zija International, Inc.

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:19-cv-08968
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Traynor v. Zija International, Judge Caproni dismissed the case with prejudice after the parties reported an agreement in principle.

Who this affects

The plaintiff and defendant were affected by the dismissal and case closure. The parties could seek to reopen the case within 30 days for good cause, and they could ask the court within that period to retain authority to enforce their settlement agreement.

What happened

In Traynor v. Zija International, Inc., the parties told the court they had reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues.

The court canceled scheduled conferences and deadlines, dismissed the case with prejudice without costs or attorney fees to either party, terminated open motions, and closed the case.

Judge Valerie Caproni allowed the parties 30 days to seek reopening for good cause or to ask the court to retain authority to enforce their settlement agreement, subject to specified filing requirements.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Traynor v. Zija International, Inc. · No. 1:19-cv-08968
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
Jan. 31, 2020

Background

Yaseen Traynor, also identified as Yaseen Traylor, brought this case on behalf of himself and others similarly situated against Zija International, Inc. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims. On January 30, 2020, the parties notified the court that they had reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues.

Court's Order

The court canceled all previously scheduled conferences and other deadlines. It dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorney fees, to either party. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate all open motions and close the case.

The parties were given 30 days to apply to reopen the case. Any such application had to show good cause for keeping the case open in light of the settlement and had to be filed within that 30-day period. The court also stated that, if the parties wanted the court to retain jurisdiction—that is, authority—to enforce their settlement agreement, they had to submit the agreement and request an order expressly retaining that authority within the same 30-day period.

Disposition

The court dismissed the case with prejudice, terminated the open motions, and closed the case. The order was signed by Judge Valerie Caproni on January 31, 2020.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.