Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 3, 2020

Chen v. Hunan Manor Enterprise, Inc.

Judge
George Daniels
Docket
1:17-cv-00802
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
8
Civil ProcedureEmploymentFlsa
In one sentence

In Chen v. Hunan Manor, Magistrate Judge Gorenstein granted plaintiffs’ amendment motion except their request to add six defendants, which he denied.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs and existing defendants were affected by which amendments could be made to the complaint; the six proposed new defendants were not added to the case.

What happened

In Chen v. Hunan Manor Enterprise, Inc., former restaurant employees sued for allegedly unpaid wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law. They asked to amend their complaint after the discovery deadline had passed.

The court granted the motion in part and denied it in part. It allowed plaintiffs to remove certain defendants, correct or add aliases, change one defendant’s name, and add existing opt-in plaintiffs and related allegations. It denied the request to add 200 CPS Investment Corp. and five individuals as new defendants.

Magistrate Judge Gorenstein ruled that the proposed new defendants were identified before discovery closed, but plaintiffs waited to seek amendment and gave no explanation for the delay. Adding them would risk reopening discovery and causing prejudice to the existing parties.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Chen v. Hunan Manor Enterprise, Inc. · No. 1:17-cv-00802
Judge
George Daniels
Date
Feb. 3, 2020

Background

The plaintiffs, former employees of the defendants’ restaurant chain, brought claims for unpaid wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and New York Labor Law (NYLL). They moved to file an amended complaint for four purposes: removing defendants against whom all claims had been dismissed; adding individuals who had filed forms consenting to join the lawsuit and adding factual allegations about them; correcting defendant names or adding aliases; and adding 200 CPS Investment Corp. and five individual defendants.

A May 2017 scheduling order set August 1, 2017, as the deadline for adding parties and amending pleadings. The court later extended the discovery deadline to June 17, 2019, but did not extend the deadlines for adding parties or amending pleadings. Plaintiffs filed their motion to amend on November 4, 2019. The court had allowed certain depositions after the discovery deadline but expressly stated that discovery was not otherwise reopened.

Legal standard

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15 generally directs courts to freely allow amendments when justice requires, but courts may deny amendment for reasons such as undue delay, bad faith, futility, or unfair prejudice. Because a scheduling order had been entered, Rule 16 also required good cause to modify the amendment deadline. The court explained that good cause depends on the moving party’s diligence, but it also recognized that it had discretion to apply Rule 15’s more liberal standard.

Rulings on the requested amendments

The court granted the request to remove Hunan Manor LLC (a New Jersey domestic limited liability company), Xiang Yun Ni, Wensheng Zhang, Zhi Ba Li, Nancy Zhou, Jimmy Cheung, Danny Wing Lok Cheun, and John Doe. The defendants did not expressly object, and the court found no prejudice to the remaining defendants.

The court also granted the request to add Zhi Ba Li as an alias of Zhi Da Li, to add Nancy Zhou and Nancy Xiao as aliases of Zhenqi Xiao, and to change the name of “Hunan Manor LLC (a NY Domestic Liability Company)” to “Hunan Manor LLC.” The defendants did not specifically object, and the court found no resulting prejudice.

The court granted the request to include the names of individuals who had filed forms consenting to join the lawsuit and to add allegations concerning them. It noted that these individuals were already plaintiffs for purposes of the FLSA because they had filed consent forms and were listed on the docket. The court nevertheless allowed the amendment because the plaintiffs appeared to seek NYLL relief as well, and the court found no prejudice to defendants.

The court denied the request to add 200 CPS Investment Corp., Qiang Wu Wang, Rong Fang Xiao, Ben Shuai Pang, Man Shen Zhang, and Jeff Li as new defendants. Plaintiffs acknowledged that they learned of these proposed defendants during a deposition on April 1, 2019, but took no action before discovery closed on June 17, 2019, and did not file the amendment motion until November 2019. The court found that plaintiffs gave no explanation for the delay. It also found that adding the new defendants could require renewed discovery because they would be entitled to seek discovery from the plaintiffs and potentially from existing defendants.

Disposition

The court concluded that the plaintiffs’ motion to amend was granted except that the request to add the six specified defendants was denied. Plaintiffs were directed to file an amended complaint consistent with the decision by February 7, 2020.

The authoritative version

Read the full 8-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.