Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 10, 2020

Magee v. The Walt Disney Company

Judge
Alison Nathan
Docket
1:19-cv-10274
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Magee v. The Walt Disney Company, Judge Nathan ordered Marshals service and extended the service deadline, while denying fee-free status for an appeal.

Who this affects

Quincy Magee, The Walt Disney Company, and The American Broadcasting Company; the order directs court personnel and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants.

What happened

Magee v. The Walt Disney Company involves Quincy Magee, who is representing himself and brings state-law breach-of-contract claims based on diversity jurisdiction. The court had already allowed Magee to proceed without paying filing fees.

Because Magee was allowed to proceed without prepaying fees, the court ordered the Clerk and U.S. Marshals Service to issue summonses and serve The Walt Disney Company and The American Broadcasting Company. The court extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summonses are issued.

Judge Alison J. Nathan also directed Magee to report any address change and certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith, denying fee-free status for an appeal. The order did not decide whether Magee's contract claims have merit.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Magee v. The Walt Disney Company · No. 1:19-cv-10274
Judge
Alison Nathan
Date
Feb. 10, 2020

Background

Quincy Magee, appearing without a lawyer, invokes the court's diversity-of-citizenship jurisdiction and asserts state-law breach-of-contract claims against The Walt Disney Company and The American Broadcasting Company. The court had previously granted Magee permission to proceed without prepaying fees.

Service of process

A person allowed to proceed without prepaying fees may rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants. Although the usual deadline under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) is 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court explained that Magee could not have served the defendants until the court reviewed the complaint and ordered summonses issued. The court therefore extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summonses are issued.

The Clerk of Court was directed to complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for each defendant, issue the summonses, and provide the Marshals Service with the documents needed for service. The Clerk was also directed to mail Magee an information package. Magee was told to notify the court in writing if the mailing address changes; the court stated that the action may be dismissed if Magee fails to do so.

Appeal and disposition

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal. The order addressed service and appeal-fee status; it did not rule on the merits of Magee's breach-of-contract claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.