Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled Feb. 10, 2020

Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v…

Full caption

Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund v. Earth Construction Corp.

Judge
Andrew Carter
Docket
1:19-cv-05411
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
6
ArbitrationContractSummary JudgmentErisa
In one sentence

In Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund v. Earth Construction Corp., Judge Carter confirmed a $132,325.46 arbitration award, interest, fees, and costs.

Who this affects

The Funds obtained a court judgment confirming the $132,325.46 arbitration award, interest, attorneys’ fees, and costs; Earth Construction Corp. was ordered to pay those amounts.

What happened

In Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund v. Earth Construction Corp., the Funds asked the court to confirm an arbitration award against Earth Construction Corp. The award concerned unpaid contributions required by a collective bargaining agreement and totaled $132,325.46. Earth Construction did not respond to the petition.

The court treated the unopposed request under the same general standard used for summary judgment. It found that the arbitrator acted within the authority granted by the collective bargaining agreement and that the award had at least a reasonable basis in that agreement and the audit evidence. The court therefore confirmed the award in its entirety.

Judge Carter also awarded the Funds 7% pre-judgment interest, post-judgment interest under federal law, $3,487.50 in attorneys’ fees, and $75 in costs. The petition was granted.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v… · No. 1:19-cv-05411
Judge
Andrew Carter
Date
Feb. 10, 2020

Background

The petitioners were trustees and organizations identified in the opinion as the Funds. They sought confirmation of an arbitration award against Earth Construction Corp. and recovery of attorneys’ fees and costs for the court proceeding.

Earth Construction performed work on public projects for the New York City School Construction Authority. The opinion states that Earth Construction became a member of the Building Contractors Association, Inc. on March 9, 2012, and was therefore bound by a collective bargaining agreement. The agreement required contributions to the Funds for covered employees, allowed the Funds to audit Earth Construction’s books and records, and permitted disputes about payments to be arbitrated.

The Funds audited Earth Construction’s records for October 14, 2010, through March 23, 2016. The audit found that Earth Construction had not paid all required contributions. After a hearing, the arbitrator issued an award on September 25, 2018, requiring payment of $132,325.46, with 7% interest accruing from the award’s issuance. The opinion states that Earth Construction had not paid any part of the award.

The Funds filed the petition to confirm the award on June 10, 2019. Earth Construction did not answer, move against the petition, or respond to the court’s order to show cause. The court treated the matter as an unopposed request for summary judgment.

Legal standard

The court explained that an arbitration award is not automatically enforceable as a court judgment. Under the Federal Arbitration Act, a court may confirm an award through a streamlined proceeding. In an unopposed confirmation matter, the court applies the summary-judgment standard: the petitioner must show that no genuine dispute about an important fact exists and that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The court must examine the petitioner’s evidence even when the opposing party submits nothing.

The court also stated that arbitration awards receive substantial deference. In a collective-bargaining-agreement case, the question is whether the arbitrator acted within the authority granted by the agreement and whether the award draws its substance from that agreement. The award may be confirmed if there is at least a minimally reasonable basis for the arbitrator’s result.

Rulings

Confirmation of the award. The court confirmed the arbitration award in its entirety. It found no dispute about any important fact, concluded that the arbitrator acted within the authority granted by the collective bargaining agreement, and determined that the audit evidence supported the finding of unpaid contributions. The court also found that the award’s provisions for interest, liquidated damages, late-payment interest, promotional-fund assessments, attorneys’ fees, and court costs were supported by the agreement. The court confirmed the award for a total of $132,325.46.

Interest. The court awarded the Funds pre-judgment interest at 7%, the rate set by the arbitrator. It also awarded interest beginning on the date judgment was entered and continuing until payment, under the federal statute governing interest on civil money judgments.

Attorneys’ fees and costs. The court found that Earth Construction had neither complied with the arbitration award nor offered a justification for its failure to do so. It determined that reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs were appropriate under the collective bargaining agreement and the statute cited in the opinion. The court awarded $3,487.50 in attorneys’ fees and $75 in costs.

Disposition

The petition to confirm the arbitration award was granted. The court directed entry of judgment in favor of the petitioners against Earth Construction Corp. for $132,325.46, plus 7% pre-judgment interest, post-judgment interest as provided by federal law, $3,487.50 in attorneys’ fees, and $75 in costs.

The authoritative version

Read the full 6-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.