Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 7, 2020

McCain v. Westchester County Jail

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:19-cv-10209
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In McCain v. Westchester County Jail, Judge McMahon denied permission to proceed without paying fees and dismissed the action without prejudice under the three-strikes bar.

Who this affects

Adrian McCain, who filed the action without a lawyer and sought to proceed without paying the filing fee, was subject to the three-strikes filing bar. The action was dismissed without prejudice; the opinion states that he may begin a new federal civil action by paying the required fees.

What happened

In McCain v. Westchester County Jail, Adrian McCain filed the action without a lawyer and asked to proceed without paying the filing fee. The court had previously found that, while he was a prisoner, he had filed at least three federal civil cases or appeals dismissed as malicious, frivolous, or for failing to state a claim.

The court ordered McCain to explain why the three-strikes filing bar should not apply. McCain submitted a declaration, but the court found that it did not give a sufficient reason to avoid the bar.

Judge McMahon recognized that the filing bar applied, denied McCain’s request to proceed without paying the filing fee, and dismissed the action without prejudice. The court said the bar does not apply if McCain is in imminent danger of serious physical injury and denied fee-free status for any appeal from the order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
McCain v. Westchester County Jail · No. 1:19-cv-10209
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Feb. 7, 2020

Background

Adrian McCain filed this action without a lawyer and requested permission to proceed without paying the filing fee, a status commonly called in forma pauperis. The court had previously determined that, while McCain was a prisoner, he had filed three or more federal civil actions or appeals that were dismissed as malicious, frivolous, or for failing to state a claim for relief.

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), those dismissals are “strikes.” A prisoner with three or more strikes generally may not proceed without paying the filing fee, unless the prisoner shows that he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. On December 16, 2019, the court ordered McCain to show why the filing bar should not apply. The court received his declaration on January 10, 2020, but found that it did not provide a sufficient reason to avoid the bar.

Ruling

The court recognized McCain as barred under § 1915(g) from filing federal civil actions or appeals without paying the filing fee while he remains a prisoner, unless the imminent-danger exception applies. The court therefore denied McCain’s request to proceed without paying the filing fee and dismissed this action without prejudice.

The court warned that submitting frivolous documents could lead to additional sanctions, including monetary penalties. It directed the Clerk of Court to mail McCain a copy of the order and record service on the docket. The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.