Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 13, 2020

Frost v. CVR Associates Inc

Judge
Colleen McMahon
Docket
1:20-cv-01136
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Frost v. CVR Associates, Judge McMahon dismissed the pro se plaintiff’s new case without prejudice for filing without required court permission.

Who this affects

Yvonne Frost and the defendants named in this action, including CVR Associates Inc.; the action was dismissed without prejudice, and fee-free status was denied for any appeal.

What happened

In Frost v. CVR Associates Inc., Yvonne Frost filed a new case without a lawyer and sought to proceed without prepaying filing fees. An earlier order had barred her from filing any new fee-free case unless she first obtained the court’s permission.

The court said Frost had not requested that permission before filing this action. It therefore dismissed the action without prejudice for failing to comply with the earlier order.

Judge Colleen McMahon directed the clerk to send Frost the order and record service on the docket. The court also said an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for any appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Frost v. CVR Associates Inc · No. 1:20-cv-01136
Judge
Colleen McMahon
Date
Feb. 13, 2020

Background

Yvonne Frost filed this new case without a lawyer and sought to proceed without prepaying filing fees. The opinion states that, in a prior related proceeding on November 7, 2019, the court barred Frost from filing any new fee-free action unless she first obtained permission from the court.

Ruling

The court stated that Frost had not sought permission before filing this action. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1651, it dismissed the action without prejudice for failing to comply with the November 7, 2019 order. The opinion does not address the merits of Frost’s claims against CVR Associates Inc. or the other defendants.

Other Directions

The clerk was directed to send Frost a copy of the order and note service on the docket. The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied Frost fee-free status for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.