Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 18, 2020

Geritano v. AUSA Office for The E.D.N.Y.

Judge
Louis Stanton
Docket
1:20-cv-00781
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Geritano v. AUSA Office for the EDNY, Judge McMahon ordered Battista Geritano to pay fees or submit authorization before the case could proceed.

Who this affects

Battista Geritano was required to pay the fees or submit the prisoner authorization within 30 days for the action to proceed; the case would be dismissed if he failed to comply.

What happened

Battista Geritano, who is incarcerated and proceeding without a lawyer, filed this case against the AUSA Office for the EDNY and other defendants. He submitted an application to proceed without paying fees upfront but did not submit the required prisoner authorization.

The court ordered Geritano, within 30 days, either to pay $400 in fees or submit the authorization allowing installment deductions from his prison account. The court said no summons would issue yet and warned that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the action.

Judge Colleen McMahon issued the order on February 18, 2020. She also denied permission to appeal without paying fees, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Geritano v. AUSA Office for The E.D.N.Y. · No. 1:20-cv-00781
Judge
Louis Stanton
Date
Feb. 18, 2020

Background

Battista Geritano, who was incarcerated at Five Points Correctional Facility, filed this action without a lawyer. The opinion states that he submitted an application to proceed without prepaying filing fees but did not submit the required prisoner authorization.

Fee and authorization requirement

The court explained that a prisoner bringing a civil action must either pay $400 in fees—a $350 filing fee and a $50 administrative fee—or request permission to proceed without prepaying fees. If permission to proceed without prepaying fees is granted, the Prison Litigation Reform Act requires collection of the $350 filing fee through installment deductions from the prisoner’s account. The prisoner authorization permits those deductions and requires the correctional facility to provide certified account statements for the preceding six months. The $50 administrative fee does not apply to a person granted permission to proceed without prepaying fees.

Order

The court ordered Geritano to do one of two things within 30 days of the order: pay the $400 in fees or complete and submit the attached prisoner authorization, labeled with docket number 20-CV-0781 (CM). The Clerk of Court was directed to mail him a copy of the order and record service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time. The court stated that, if Geritano complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures; if he did not comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed.

Judge Colleen McMahon certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The court also cautioned that a prisoner action dismissed as frivolous or for failing to state a claim can count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and that a prisoner with three strikes generally cannot proceed without prepaying fees unless the prisoner faces imminent danger of serious physical injury.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.